fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
Wednesday » August 3 » 2005

Young Liberals want kids to cover up
Kick off convention with proposals to lift tuition freeze, impose school dress code

MIKE DE SOUZA
The Gazette


Tuesday, August 02, 2005


Pre-teens and adolescents should not be allowed to wear provocative clothes in schools, high-ranking members of the Quebec Liberal Party youth wing said yesterday.

Following a series of media reports on an increase in early sexual activity among pre-teens and adolescents, Liberal youth wing executives want a government-imposed dress code as part of a strategy to tackle the issue. The proposal is among 20 resolutions up for debate at the coming weekend convention of young Liberals in Sherbrooke.

"When you see a little girl who's 8 or 12 years old wearing a g-string, that's maybe a bit too provocative and offensive," said Simon Begin, president of the party's youth commission.

"I don't want to act like an outraged Conservative. It doesn't outrage me more than that."

The strategy would include an information campaign for parents, youth and the schools, along with setting up teams of social workers to monitor the issue in each school board.

The resolution on sexual activity and another proposal in favour of lifting the freeze on university tuition fees stood out among other more progressive motions including a plan to nationalize Quebec's water resources, and a proposal to reform aid programs for compulsive gamblers.

Following a recent tour of Quebec's regions, Begin said the dress code sparked the most debate.

"Some told us (the resolution) makes no sense, others told us we should go as far as imposing a mandatory uniform," he said.

"We found a middle ground, so we're proposing a dress code for debate at the convention and we'll see what the youth will tell us," he said. "It's a question of values and it will be a nice debate to follow at the convention."

But there was strong resistance to the idea from officials at various school boards.

"I think the school boards are able to decide whether its pertinent or not," said Annie Blouin, spokesperson for the Federation des commissions scolaires du Quebec.

Though a dress code could be a factor that leads to other problems like violence, taxing and other forms of bullying, she said it's up to each school to decide how to handle the situation.

In Montreal, there are a wide variety of rules regarding dress codes in different schools, said Lester B. Pearson school board chairperson Marcus Tabachnick.

But he admits many governing boards are concerned about early sexual activity, which also might be the result of advertising aimed at young people

"That's what sells these days," he said. "It's all around television shows, what they read and see in the movies."

Ironically, Quebec's Education Department is eliminating a 125-hour sexual education program in secondary schools when the new school year starts next month. In its place, the department is distributing a document of guidelines to help teachers include the issue in a wide range of subjects ranging from language classes, to moral instruction and science and technology.

"It can be brought up in any subject," said department spokesperson Francois Lefebvre. "But it's not necessarily the math teacher who will talk about it first."

The new curriculum follows recommendations of Estates- General hearings of the 1990s. Lefebvre said the school boards and individual schools are expected to follow through and interpret the guidelines in the same way they handle the rest of the curriculum. But he admits the fear of accusations of harassment or the threat of complaints make it harder for some teachers to follow through in the area of sexual education.

"There's a particular sensitivity that wasn't there 15, 20, 25 years ago," he said. "It's always a bit delicate, and people are always ill at ease."

With one-third of the votes at Liberal Party meetings and conventions, the youth wing, which considers itself to be the most powerful youth lobby in Canada, is also proposing Estates-General hearings on a plan to nationalize Quebec's water resources for profit.

"In the same way we profited from hydroelectricity, we could also profit from the water (industry)," Begin said. "If we were able to ensure a sustainable (industry) - one that wouldn't endanger the resource - why shouldn't we do it, just like Albertans made money with oil?"

Asked about a rise in support for sovereignty in recent opinion polls, Begin said no young Quebecers he met were talking about the issue. While youngsters mobilize on a number of issues, he said he couldn't imagine them marching on the streets to promote sovereignty.

But his counterpart with the Parti Quebecois said there were thousands of young people who paid to see shows to celebrate Quebec's Fete Nationale in Montreal this year.

"While my generation is waking up, I'm seriously questioning where the young Liberals are," said Claude Villeneuve, president of the PQ's comite national des jeunes. He said the recent student strike over proposed cuts to bursaries sparked new interest in alternatives to Quebec's position in the Canadian federation.

mdesouza@thegazette.canwest.com

Date: 2005-08-03 08:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
Hey, I'm all for gay marriage (or unions, at any rate), and I damn well want to see the youngin's start covering their asses. You've never seen a nine year old girl pester her mother for Playboy-brand g-strings before.

The uniform thing doesn't really strike me as being all-out crazy either. We have them in Australia at 99.99% of schools (apart from technical education colleges and Montessori schools) and nobody really complains: they're cost-effective, they're especially good with lower-income students who don't feel ashamed to have to wear the same thing every day, and if it means I don't have to see any more size six hipsters on size fourteen frames, hell, I'll give it eleven hundred thumbs up.

Date: 2005-08-03 08:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
No, I find it hysterical that these folks should suddenly rediscover sexual morality. And if you read the article with some care, you will see why: it was because there has been a media kerfuffle about eight- and twelve-year-olds dressed like whores. The Liberals, who have no morals in anything, fear only one thing: to be found out by the media. Hence this sudden awakening.

Date: 2005-08-03 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rfachir.livejournal.com
Color me pragmatic - if it gets children to dress with dignity, I'm all for it. Now if they can just pass a law limiting the size of the belly hanging out of the belly-button shirts for adults, and banning pants that aren't defying the pull of gravity, I may move to Canada.

Date: 2005-08-03 10:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
And Britney Spears low-belted skintight jeans. Those are my particular personal abhorrence. However, I do not believe for a minute that these folks will do anything serious about children's dress. They are Canadian Liberals, remember. They do not keep their word.

Date: 2005-08-03 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
It's not to say that all liberal people are for the sexualisation of children: I doubt you'll find anyone but the most lazy and neglectful of parents who would actually buy their kids those trashy things - more a matter of bad parenting as opposed to liberalism or conservatism.

Date: 2005-08-03 10:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
I think you are confusing "liberal people" with the Liberal Party of Canada, which is an illiberal and corrupt conspiracy designed to seize and hold power by any means and to use it to feather their nests.

Date: 2005-08-04 01:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neigedens.livejournal.com
Well, to be fair, in Canada I would guess it's just like here: if you want to wear a shirt and a miniskirt that flaunt your, um, assets, you can only wear it for two or three months out of the school year, tops. (Of course, this doesn't stop some people.)

Around here the only places that wear uniforms are the Catholic schools. A lot of my friends are vehemently against any sort of uniforms in the public schools, though. If you talk to my friend she'll spill all these impassioned arguments about freedom to be an individual and what-not. (Which always makes me ask, "what individuals? We all dress the same anyway." That kind of makes her angry.)

Date: 2005-08-04 02:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patchworkmind.livejournal.com
Yep. It's pretty funny.

Date: 2005-08-04 02:12 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
HOW DARE YOU ARGUE WITH THE LOGIC OF A SIXTEEN YEAR OLD GENIUS, BRIANA! Everyone knows how these fiesty independent original grrls are so intellect.

Date: 2005-08-04 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
...and once again Briana confirms that she is way more mature than her years.

Date: 2005-08-04 02:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Yes, as one can see by the constant gretness of their literary productions.

Date: 2005-08-04 03:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
Is 'gretness' intentional? If it is, you mispelled 'literary': it should be 'littery'.


Teenage girls are terrific!

Date: 2005-08-04 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Brianna is. As for the misspelling, I will give you an indirect answer: I am being kept awake by a violent stomach disorder I am trying to ignore. What do you think?

Date: 2005-08-04 03:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
I am a smartarse?

Actually, seeing as you are sick, I'll give you a present to make you feel better, by the author of the article I sent the other day (turns out he is a small-c conservative afterall):

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/archives/2005/07/islamist_violen.html

Actually, a lot of stuff on that blog is pretty interesting.

Date: 2005-08-04 08:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
Hell, I'm in favour of drugs legalization, and I wish there had been uniforms at my school.

Date: 2005-08-04 09:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Oh, I am in favour of legalizing drugs too. (Perhaps with the exception of LSD, which can ruin you for life with one shot.) it is just that the notion of the Canadian Libs rediscovering sexual morality is so utterly hilarious.

Date: 2005-08-04 09:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
Well, in France we have Conservatives who think that school girls should undress for the sake of Laicity, so I think that I like the Canadian Libs better (at least they don't look lecherous).

Date: 2005-08-04 10:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
They don't?

Date: 2005-08-05 12:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
Well, they can't look more lecherous than Jean-Pierre Raffarin and Nicolas Sarkozy, can they?

Date: 2005-08-05 12:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Uh... no, I guess.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 07:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios