Well, but, even if he is not guilty (which I think highly unlikely. I was sure he had done it; granted the evidence was circumstantial, it was cumulatively very strong.) Even if he were truly innocent, he is still exploiting the deaths of a couple of human beings, and the pain and suffering of their families, for fame. I find that absolutely despicable.
As for Michael Jackson, I think he is nuts, poor soul, and I would not want any child I had to do with anywhere near him. But he has not killed anybody, nor is he trying to rack up notoriety through trading on pain, death and bloodshed.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-11-17 02:47 am (UTC)As for Michael Jackson, I think he is nuts, poor soul, and I would not want any child I had to do with anywhere near him. But he has not killed anybody, nor is he trying to rack up notoriety through trading on pain, death and bloodshed.
Just my two cents.