Date: 2008-04-02 05:45 pm (UTC)
I think in general the description of left and right is still useful in terms of support or opposition for the sources of traditional authority - e.g. a moderate or conservative person will be respectful towards existing authorities, symbols and realities of power, and precedent; while a person who is qualified as a left-winger will show a desire to alter or replace them. In fact, I argued elsewhere that in the USA the defintions are in some ways becoming more rather than less relevant, because of the formation of a definite class of hereditary aristocrats.

Fascism is to some extent something that belongs to a particular period in history. Never again shall we, in the west (places such as India, China or Russia may be another matter) see a combination of extreme nationalist and illiberal attitudes take, thanks to the collapse of more moderate right-wing forces, the dimension of a mass movement worthy of government. On the other hand, these elements - ultra-nationalism; traditionalism; militarism; irrationalism; violence as cleansing, wholesome, purifying; intolerance of debate or opposition - are not completely eliminable from the body politic, and even in a healthy democracy a certain percentage of the electorate - from five to ten per cent - will tend toward them.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 10:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios