Entry tags:
A bad joke
This article (http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/CalThomas/2008/04/08/civil_tongues?page=full&comments=true) starts by arguing for politeness and substantial dialogue between opponents in the coming American Presidential elections. The zinger, however, is in the last two paragraphs. Look at the ugly, repulsive caricature of Democratic politics it gives - and ask yourselves if the author even understands what being polite to opposing views actually means. Even I, with my temper and all, could do a better job of presenting a picture, rather than an insulting caricature, of an opponent's viewpoint.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Thomas, by the way may have learnt everything he knows about tolerance while abroad on holiday. It appears he owns a holiday home here in Northern Ireland, that famous bastion of moderation and reasoned debate.
no subject
Oh, rubbish. In fact, balls.
This may be ugly and repulsive, but it is no caricature.
Or as the Rt Hon Margaret Thatcher, member for Finchley, said when the Callaghan government fell, ‘There has been a failure not only of policies but of the whole philosophy on which they are based - the philosophy which elevates the state, dwarfs the individual and enlarges the bureaucracy.’
That IS the Left – contemptible creatures that they are. One may as well say so.
Re: Oh, rubbish. In fact, balls.
Incidentally, if you do not understand the concept of not dehumanizing your opponent, you might at least remember that this is my blog and I decide whose words stay or go. A buon intenditor, poche parole.