fpb: (Default)
fpb ([personal profile] fpb) wrote2008-04-28 08:50 pm
Entry tags:

I have a suspicion that trouble with FA is about to flare up again

My older friends will remember the long war I had with a previous generation of FA moderators. Now I have lost my temper again, spectacularly and on their threads, and I suspect that it will make trouble.

I just read a chaptered fic (you will understand that I have no intention to increase the author's hit count, so we'll forget the name and title) which contains the following passage (behind lj-cut):
"Precisely," Caitlin smiled thinly. "And if it sounds horrible to you, think what a mage would think, coming from a community where you had magical privies that made the waste disappear, mud resistant robes, cures for most diseases known to the Muggles, a non-existent infant mortality rate, nice clean stone buildings for everyone, house elves that kept everything sanitary using magic and a standard of living not far off what you're both used to. I'm telling you, the phrase 'filthy Muggles' wasn't abuse back then, it was a fact. Of course the mages of the day felt they were superior - why wouldn't they? The poorest mage lived better than a Muggle king. Salazar was only different in that his attitudes were more extreme and professed more openly. He wasn't interested in saving Muggles from themselves, and he certainly didn't want their children around, with their insistence in only one god, and eternal damnation for those who didn't follow him, and that magic users not sanctioned by their High Priest in Rome were going straight to Hell. Actually can't say I entirely blame him on that score," she said with a grin.

Luella had to admit that being told that your magic was evil on a daily basis would probably annoy even the most patient of mages.

"But that doesn't mean being a Muggle-born makes you inferior!" she responded.

"Well, of course not," Caitlin replied. "Times have changed, and so have Muggles. Most love the idea of magic. That weird Middle Eastern crucifixion cult has lost its hold on their minds. And perhaps most importantly, they've discovered science, and it's given them power equal to ours in a way. No, Luella, in no way do I think Muggles are inferior. But back then, Salazar had some good points, and a lot of mages agreed with him, up until the point where he started secretly advocating the extermination of Muggle-borns, and the banning of mage-Muggle marriages, or at least severely restricting them to suitable candidates. That was when he crossed the line, and that's when war broke out, and Salazar got thrown out of Hogwarts. Battles were fought, alliances were made and broken, and a particularly nasty bloodfeud ensued that endures to this day. Salazar, I might add, lost, although his House stayed. Enough of them repented or stayed loyal to make it worthwhile keeping it. After all, Salazar Slytherin was still a Founder. But from then on, Slytherin House was seen as different, marked out by its past. At best, a house to be wary of, at worst the source of everything evil. Dark mages from Gryffindor, Ravenclaw and Hufflepuff are overlooked or explained away as having had a traumatic past. Dark Slytherins have always been blown up into terrifying figures of absolute evil. Their Dark Mages are seen as one-offs, aberrations. Ours are seen as typical Slytherins. Until the 1970's, we Slytherins have always put up with the prejudice and just got on with our lives. We dealt with it by consoling ourselves that our house may be evil but at least we were the talented ones. That's why we're noted for our ambition: we start out automatically disadvantaged and work twice as hard to catch up. We've all got something to prove. We've been hated but we get by....

I found this not only offensive but a genuine instance of hate speech, including evident racist overtones (apparently being "middle eastern" is bad) and a loathsome misrepresentation of historical fact. I let the author know in the comments thread, and added a warning against this fic in the thread where I had originally found the link. Now it all depends on whether the moderators think this is, a), flaming, and, b), not justified by the evident and contemptible hate speech in the fic. Either way, I really do not think I intend to retract a single word.

Re: The beliefs and actions of (a) character(s) are not automatically those of the author.

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2008-04-29 02:19 am (UTC)(link)
That is another red herring. I did not say that Christians have it as bad as some other groups in Western society (although I suggest you try to imagine yourself as a Christian in a Muslim or Communist country - go on, read what North Korea does to suspected Christians); I said that the terms used and the descriptions made were equally offensive. Rebecca, I always tried to treat you and your views with respect, but this sort of reaction suggests that you have no desire to return that respect. You're not the one who is being offended, I am, and you have no right to tell me that an outrageous misrepresentation of me, my religion, and my people is not in fact offensive.

Re: The beliefs and actions of (a) character(s) are not automatically those of the author.

[identity profile] redcoast.livejournal.com 2008-04-29 04:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Of course I want to treat you with respect! But offensiveness is a tricky thing, what offends one may not offend the other. Perhaps if I read the whole story and saw it in context it would be more offensive, but the speaker is already justifying Slytherin and the Pureblood blather and other things that are presented in the HP books as unjustifiable, so that's how I took it.

Re: The beliefs and actions of (a) character(s) are not automatically those of the author.

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2008-04-29 05:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, I can tell you that in the story Slytherin house is not pureblood at all, and some of its protagonists are Muggleborn.