ext_23479 (
curia-regis.livejournal.com
) wrote
in
fpb
2008-06-21 12:47 pm (UTC)
Re: For what it's worth
Ah! Really, for these discussions, we should include definitions of all the words we use. :)
My definition of normal is more loaded. I see it as a normative term that automatically classifies everything else as 'abnormal' or deviant.
Whereas, I guess I'd see your definition of normal more as 'average' or maybe 'the majority'. :)
(
135 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Re: For what it's worth
My definition of normal is more loaded. I see it as a normative term that automatically classifies everything else as 'abnormal' or deviant.
Whereas, I guess I'd see your definition of normal more as 'average' or maybe 'the majority'. :)