Considering that I excluded that meaning at the start of our discussion, I find this rather strange. Do you remember that I said that variation from the norm is both inevitable and mostly useful? I do not exclude such a thing as a bad kind of abnormality, but that is simply not what we are talking about here. And it is you, not I, who assume that the only possible opposite to normality is the bad kind of abnormality. Get rid of that false opposition, it will do you good. Genius, holiness, and heroism, are all abnormal. Reflect on it.
Re: For what it's worth
Date: 2008-06-21 03:10 pm (UTC)