I must have totally missed that. Sorry. It was a rather long debate and I was typing it at 2 am yesterday morning!
In any case, I still dislike the world abnormal. Regardless of the definition. To me, the implication is still a deviant type of abnormality rather than a 'good' abnormality.
Re: For what it's worth
Date: 2008-06-21 03:13 pm (UTC)In any case, I still dislike the world abnormal. Regardless of the definition. To me, the implication is still a deviant type of abnormality rather than a 'good' abnormality.