fpb: (Default)
fpb ([personal profile] fpb) wrote2009-10-16 07:32 pm
Entry tags:

Upon hearing an Eric Clapton guitar solo

At times like this, I really do feel sorry for atheists. One has to be grateful for artistry so miraculous, but they have nobody to be grateful to. (And don't give me any crap about "the human spirit" - that is what we owe the Murdoch press and robotic dance noise to.)

[identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 07:51 pm (UTC)(link)
So to you the unpredictability and hence uncontrollability of the phenomenon of genius implies that the atheist's experience of (exposure to) it is incomplete?



[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 07:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Um. Putting it like that jumps a few connections I would make, and I would not say that that is the main feature about it. But having said all that - yes.

That is a long journey for something I really meant as a boutade - and that is not very novel either.

[identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 08:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Okay.

As far as contemporary science knows, it is in principle impossible to predict the position at which an electron will hit a screen after it passes through a narrow slit. Is the atheist's appreciation of this phenomenon incomplete?

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Did an electron write the Divine Comedy? And yes, I know that Dante's body was full of electrons. As for the principle of randomness, I think it is completed once you understand it as an aspect of the free will of a sovereign God as expressed in His creation.

[identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Since you seem to be concerned with tackling that which you assume I am going to say after you answer "no", am I to take it that your answer to my question is "no"?

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I thought the question had to do with the principle of randomness and I tried to answer it accordingly.

[identity profile] shelestel.livejournal.com 2009-10-17 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
The question is the following: are there natural phenomena which are unpredictable (either in principle or in practice - due to their great complexity) of which the atheist's experience is complete? If yes - please provide an example. If no - please justify.

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2009-12-28 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
No. Because everything that exists has an extra dimension from whose perception the atheist has cut him/herself off.