ext_50177 ([identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] fpb 2010-03-02 09:34 pm (UTC)

Yes, but in Marxism it is essential, so fundamental that it is the last thing to go. The basic idea is: what one capitalist gains, another loses (hence Marx' forecast of growing, and finally universal, oligopoly and monopoly); what the capitalist class gains, the lower classes lose. The point has to be emphasized, because it has to overcome a common attitude among lower classes, that is that their prosperity and safety is tied up with the success of their upper-class leaders (hence the loyalty to kings and the like which is so widespread a historical phenomenon).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting