That's actually pretty interesting -- thank you. I am fairly well-read about early Christian theology, but I was not familiar with Docetism.
Now, if I may ask you a serious question without you interpreting it as an attack on your religion or an attempt to engage you in a fight? (Let's just leave it as a given that I don't share your beliefs, okay?) Because I'm genuinely interested here:
Are you saying that the RCC's position is, in fact, that homosexuals are more serious sinners than, say, adulterers or divorcees or people who use birth control or abortion? Or is that specifically gay marriage is an attack on church teachings? If this child's parents were openly gay but not claiming to be married, would they have been treated just like any other sinners (i.e., every other child's parents)?
no subject
Now, if I may ask you a serious question without you interpreting it as an attack on your religion or an attempt to engage you in a fight? (Let's just leave it as a given that I don't share your beliefs, okay?) Because I'm genuinely interested here:
Are you saying that the RCC's position is, in fact, that homosexuals are more serious sinners than, say, adulterers or divorcees or people who use birth control or abortion? Or is that specifically gay marriage is an attack on church teachings? If this child's parents were openly gay but not claiming to be married, would they have been treated just like any other sinners (i.e., every other child's parents)?