Thank you for explaining; I read your post, and then inverarity's, and then the comments on Mr Wright's Belloc post, and I was still confused. But then, having never read Bradley's book, and being ignorant of the facts behind it, all I had to go on was inverarity's review.

So, yes, thank you for explaining. I now completely understand the strength of your reaction to his disingenuous review.

I think I need to step away from the internet for a while, so that I can have some reaction to illogic, moral relativism, the twisting (or omitting) of facts to suit one's agenda, etc, besides just a weary sigh and a feeling of "not this again."