"And as a believer in representative government, I find it interesting that you should ban certain representatives from discussing matters of public interest due to their genital apparatus"
Your values are distorting your reading comprehension. I didn't imply men should be banned; I noted that *women* were not included in a health panel about their own health options. They were the ones effectively banned. The appropriate analogy would be a panel entirely of women deciding on payment for prostate exams, or on paternal visitation and custody rights.
"IUDs that frequently injure the womb" -- this seems to be about as accurate as your belief that Coca-cola is an effective contraceptive.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-10-05 03:58 am (UTC)Your values are distorting your reading comprehension. I didn't imply men should be banned; I noted that *women* were not included in a health panel about their own health options. They were the ones effectively banned. The appropriate analogy would be a panel entirely of women deciding on payment for prostate exams, or on paternal visitation and custody rights.
"IUDs that frequently injure the womb" -- this seems to be about as accurate as your belief that Coca-cola is an effective contraceptive.