"And as a believer in representative government, I find it interesting that you should ban certain representatives from discussing matters of public interest due to their genital apparatus"

Your values are distorting your reading comprehension. I didn't imply men should be banned; I noted that *women* were not included in a health panel about their own health options. They were the ones effectively banned. The appropriate analogy would be a panel entirely of women deciding on payment for prostate exams, or on paternal visitation and custody rights.

"IUDs that frequently injure the womb" -- this seems to be about as accurate as your belief that Coca-cola is an effective contraceptive.