Date: 2012-10-05 04:09 am (UTC)
As for your defence of your views on representative government, if the said panel had women in it and came to the same conclusions, you would just conclude that they weren't "real" women. That's what your party did to Sarah Palin and does to any women who dares disagree with their notion of "women's" sexuality - which is actually a male sexual fantasy which some unhappy women have internalized, to their own very evident distress expressed in shrill anger and unreasoning hatred.

About the vast health dangers of contraceptives (depo-provera causes bone loss, IUDs injure the womb, the Pill messes with the natural hormonal cycle - etc) and the increasingly disastrous effects of the Pill on the environment (rise of sexual disfunction among fish and other animals) the trouble is that your values so interfere with your sense of reality that you could read whole reams of articles and reports and dismiss them as biased junk science. I have been through this before, which is why I won't bother giving you the references I have. I would have to expect you to have an open mind before I wasted my time, and anyone who can repeat with a straight face that most of what Planned Slaughter do is not abortion is too bound up with abortionist fables for reason.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios