A historic moment

[fpb]

This election has already given us a historic moment; a moment which, I think, may well feature in future histories, become the centre of scholarly debate, and perhaps even be remembered as one of those factoids that everyone remembers about historical figures - like Pontius Pilate washing his hands, or Washington's troops starving at Valley Forge, or the fat figure and six wives of Henry VIII.

No, I don't mean the debate, although the results of the debate may well come to connect themselves with the event I mean. The event I mean is the publication, by the Obama campaign, of the following blog entry:



This is incredible. If it means anything, it means that the Republicans, if elected, would engage in a campaign of tearing out uteri from living women.

I think I can say with a clean conscience that no campaign ever stooped this low. This is a record, and, I would say, probably unsurpassable. My friends who are historians and know what I am talking about can make the mental experiment: project yourselves into the minds of Julius Streicher or Gabriele d'Annunzio. Try to imagine Streicher saying that about Jews, or d'Annunzio about democratic politicians. You can't. You know you can't. They would not think of it; and if they did, they, even they, would laugh at it as at a crazy joke. The evident and rather unpleasant sexualness of the enclosed drawing, featuring a lightly-dressed, apparently underaged young lady with her clothes being blown all over by the wind - the very image of the worst kind of irresponsible male fantasies - makes the thing even worse: it as good as invites women to identify with this near-paedophile fantasy image, and to imagine that there is something there that is worth something for women to keep and that it threatens women to lose. The abyss of abjection in the association of visual idea and depraved gag literally challenges description and analysis.

This does, of course, confirm my old belief that abortion is the central issue and the driving force of so much that seems unhinged and bewildering about modern politics. But it also suggests a desperacy lurking somewhere below the confident gloss of Obaman politics; as though these people felt the breath of the Avenger of Blood breathing over their neck, and feared it even where the rest of us can't begin to feel any presence except theirs. It is like the crazed language of British medical bodies on the subject of abortion - language that a child would know was insane. But it also suggests an essential hollowness at the heart of the Obaman message. If that is the sort of thing they resort to, they must feel they have exhausted every other weapon. Now, add this to the effect of Romney's definite victory in last night's debate, and see what you get.

Comments

[captainpeabody.livejournal.com]

This doesn't surprise me in the least. This has been essentially the tone and content of progressive rhetoric for the last six months. At this point, a significant portion of the population quite literally believes that the Republican party, as we speak, desperately wants to ban contraception, and is only prevented from doing so because they don't have enough power in government. They believe that conservatives, almost to a man, hate and are afraid of women and female sexuality, and are conspiring together in a "war on women" to bring society back into (and I quote) "the Dark Ages" of theocratic, chauvinistic, gay-hating superstition. Because of this imminent assault, they feel that they have to rally the troops now by any means necessary, and to frighten the prudish conservatives into silence they have to be as crude and openly sexual as they possibly can, at all times.

And this is not merely a desperate, out-of-touch political narrative foisted on the people by the political management--this is what is believed by the rank-and-file. This image was created and shared millions upon millions of times throughout the Internet before the Obama campaign even noticed it existed.

Thus is modern American politics. I hope for the love of God that Europe is not in this state.

[fpb.livejournal.com]

Europe varies. I am fairly certain that when abortion becomes an issue (which it is at present only in a few Catholic countries, especially Italy and Ireland) this kind of reactions will develop, especially in the Low Countries, Germany and Scandinavia and probably England. Elsewhere there is more likely to be an understanding of the dubious nature of this kind of propaganda. However, the point is that because abortion in Europe was never unlimited - most countries stop at the third or sixth month - the European consciences have not been as constantly stimulated as the American, where such things as partial-birth abortion ended up on the newspapers and being vigorously debated. However, my view is that the day is coming. I know for a fact that even in Britain, which is a kind of one-party state where abortion is concerned, they are having trouble finding doctors interested in performing the "service". As someone said, you don't become a doctor with the idea of tearing human flesh and dropping torn human limbs down the drain.