How much time in your life have you spent in close proximity with male and female homosexuals? Me, it's been about ten years. That celibate gay community you seem to have heard of never seemed to be in any of their experience - but then, I only lived in a bucolic, provincial little hole called London. I well remember the annoyance of my 100% gay friend Adrian when he found a pub he knew had gone gay - he had not gone there to be checked out by everyone and he wanted to use the toilets for their original use. The fact is that a community that defines itself by its taste for a particular sex act cannot help but be concerned with sex and with members as prospective sex partners or objects. Of course your ideology won't admit this, but reality does.
All the privileges you mention are not even secondary, not even tertiary, they have nothing whatsoever to do with marriage as an institution. If you want to marry because you want tax privileges, you are not even a whore, you are an idiot. They are petty little legal enactments that can be demolished - and mostly have been - at the state's caprice, and where inheritance is concerned, are largely the individual's choice. And please, no more sob stories about nurses forbidding affectionate partners from staying at their beloved's bedside. I have an allergic reaction to sentimental manipulation.
Frankenstein technology may breed human beings out of pigs for all I know - I am not interested and I hope sanity prevails, although between sanity and sentimentality manipulated by money power the battle is far from certain. Meanwhile, what gay men do is purchase them. A man who purchases the sexual services of a woman is called a john, right? Well, in that case a man who purchases a baby must be called an Elton, since a man who purchases the sexual services of a woman in order to buy a baby is called an Elton John. Money, of course, can do anything.
no subject
All the privileges you mention are not even secondary, not even tertiary, they have nothing whatsoever to do with marriage as an institution. If you want to marry because you want tax privileges, you are not even a whore, you are an idiot. They are petty little legal enactments that can be demolished - and mostly have been - at the state's caprice, and where inheritance is concerned, are largely the individual's choice. And please, no more sob stories about nurses forbidding affectionate partners from staying at their beloved's bedside. I have an allergic reaction to sentimental manipulation.
Frankenstein technology may breed human beings out of pigs for all I know - I am not interested and I hope sanity prevails, although between sanity and sentimentality manipulated by money power the battle is far from certain. Meanwhile, what gay men do is purchase them. A man who purchases the sexual services of a woman is called a john, right? Well, in that case a man who purchases a baby must be called an Elton, since a man who purchases the sexual services of a woman in order to buy a baby is called an Elton John. Money, of course, can do anything.