You know this is why you fall out with so many people, right? We have never, ever disagreed online without you getting hard and sarcastic right away. Did you even read my posts? In neither of them do I say that I'm sure Mr. Zimmerman was guilty of manslaughter and that I could prove it with "brilliant evidence" (my God! Do you read you *own* posts before you put them online?). I did say that I didn't have as much confidence in juries as you seem to have (a generalization, to be sure), and I also said that I thought Zimmerman did something that was wrong and should be illegal. I was actually talking about his following the boy, and even if I'm wrong that there oughta be a law against it, it still strikes me as more than a bit off. I suppose it will be considered in the inevitable civil case.
I'm going to do that thing I always do and you hate, which is drop out of this discussion. By all means, interpret it as some kind of a concession on my part, but the fact is I might have continued the conversation -- and, who knows, refined my views! -- if you weren't so awful.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2013-07-19 02:41 am (UTC)I'm going to do that thing I always do and you hate, which is drop out of this discussion. By all means, interpret it as some kind of a concession on my part, but the fact is I might have continued the conversation -- and, who knows, refined my views! -- if you weren't so awful.