Ridiculous

Aug. 25th, 2004 11:33 am
fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
I found out only recently, and with great irritation, that the translator of the standard English version of the epic of Gilgamesh, N.K.Sandars, was called Nancy and was a woman. I don't know why she would conceal her name in this way, or whether it had anything to do with her sex, but I could not help thinking about the way that Joanne Kathleen Rowling's publishers shortened her name to JK to prevent readers realizing that this author of adventurous stories about two boys and a girl was a woman herself. And then there is the strange phenomenon of the illustrious (if bitchy) British writer universally known as A.S.Byatt. I am not often heard to take this kind of positions, but I find this simply ridiculous. That in this day and age, the identity of a woman should be disguised in order to enter her into the artform practiced by Deborah the prophetess, by Sappho and the other Earthly Muses, by the Virgin Mary (the Magnificat), St.Hildegard of Bingen, Christine de Pisan, Teresa of Cartagena, Vittoria Colonna, St.Teresa of Avila, Madame de Lafayette, Madame de Sevigne', Jane Austen, Annette von Droste, the Bronte sisters, Louisa May Alcott, Mrs.Gaskell, and so on and so forth and so following, is ridiculous... sorry to repeat myself, but what other word is fitting? Or rather, it should be ridiculous, were it not that nobody can find the force to laugh. Have they ever gone away, the days of George Eliot, George Sand, and Currer Bell?

Date: 2004-08-25 04:16 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Unfortunately, this is not ridiculous; there is still a fair amount of prejudice against female authors--and most particularly female critics and translators--in the literary world. This goes double in the academic world where classics are concerned. Sad but true. Still, things are improving. Certainly there are far more women involved in such pursuits than there used to be, and openly.

Date: 2004-08-25 06:39 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I don't think it's a matter of sexism so much as a matter of how an author name 'looks' on a book's cover. Look at J. R. R. Tolkein, C. S. Lewis or even G. K. Chesterton as examples - the use of an initial conveys more authority in the minds of some readers (or even in the mind of the author themselves).

I could not help thinking about the way that Joanne Kathleen Rowling's publishers shortened her name to JK to prevent readers realizing that this author of adventurous stories about two boys and a girl was a woman herself

I'm interested in knowing where that information came from as I'd thought Rowling had submitted the manuscript to agencies using JK Rowling, although signing the covering letters with her full name.

Date: 2004-08-25 09:09 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Ever heard of J.R.R. Tolkien? C.S. Lewis? Using one's initials is not just something women do.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 09:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios