Entry tags:
Pat Robertson on another contentious issue of foreign policy
A few days ago, the supposedly conservative and supposedly Christian leader Pat Robertson made a fool of himself by calling for the assassination of Venezuelan president and all-around unpleasant guy Chavez. Now a conservative news service has dug up another scandalous interview by the same man, from archives of CNN no less, which makes it clear that where human life is concerned, and especially human life outside America, Robertson believes that the end justifies the means, however brutal both end and means may be. If anyone is willing to take him seriously as a Christian leader after this, I am not.
PAT ROBERTSON DEFENDS CHINA'S FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM
WASHINGTON, Apr 17, 2001 (LSN.ca) - Pat Robertson, founder and chairman of The Christian Broadcasting Network and the celebrated host of the 40-year-running 700 Club program, disappointed hundreds of thousands of his fans Monday night as he defended China's notorious family planning program. In an interview on CNN's "Wolf Blitzer Reports" Robertson, founder and President of the Christian Coalition, was asked, "How do you balance your historic support for closer relation with China, improved trade relations with China, with what many conservatives complain about, specifically the so-called forced abortions in China?"
Robertson, who has spoken valiantly in favour of life in the United States, responded: "Well, you know, I don't agree with it. But at the same time, they've got 1.2 billion people, and they don't know what to do. If every family over there was allowed to have three or four children, the population would be completely unsustainable. ... So, I think that right now they're doing what they have to do. I don't agree with the forced abortion, but I don't think the United States needs to interfere with what they're doing internally in this regard."
When Blitzer asked for clarification, asking, "But in effect, won't your critics on the right be saying that Pat Robertson is justifying abortions in China?", Robertson avoided the issue and condemned only sex-selective abortions.
Bear in mind that supporting abortion for the sake of population reduction but opposing sex-selective abortions is the hallmark of abortionist hypocrisy which we oppose. Robertson has as good as identified himself with the enemy.
PAT ROBERTSON DEFENDS CHINA'S FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM
WASHINGTON, Apr 17, 2001 (LSN.ca) - Pat Robertson, founder and chairman of The Christian Broadcasting Network and the celebrated host of the 40-year-running 700 Club program, disappointed hundreds of thousands of his fans Monday night as he defended China's notorious family planning program. In an interview on CNN's "Wolf Blitzer Reports" Robertson, founder and President of the Christian Coalition, was asked, "How do you balance your historic support for closer relation with China, improved trade relations with China, with what many conservatives complain about, specifically the so-called forced abortions in China?"
Robertson, who has spoken valiantly in favour of life in the United States, responded: "Well, you know, I don't agree with it. But at the same time, they've got 1.2 billion people, and they don't know what to do. If every family over there was allowed to have three or four children, the population would be completely unsustainable. ... So, I think that right now they're doing what they have to do. I don't agree with the forced abortion, but I don't think the United States needs to interfere with what they're doing internally in this regard."
When Blitzer asked for clarification, asking, "But in effect, won't your critics on the right be saying that Pat Robertson is justifying abortions in China?", Robertson avoided the issue and condemned only sex-selective abortions.
Bear in mind that supporting abortion for the sake of population reduction but opposing sex-selective abortions is the hallmark of abortionist hypocrisy which we oppose. Robertson has as good as identified himself with the enemy.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
;) Anecdotal but it rings true in my experience too.
no subject
I don't see how he can call himself a Christian Minister with a straight face anymore. This is truly repugnant behavior, especially from someone who supposedly stands on the right side of morality. What a farce.
no subject
Except for abortion, these are phenomena which have a curious double life as fringe and leadership features. To most women, "feminism" means the defence of certain rights - equal work for equal pay, etc. - which most sensible people would accept; and of abortion, which is questionable but definitely mainstream. But the more you go into the hard core of established feminism, into the movements, the permanent self-help groups, and the chair of "women's studies", the more you find that what you have is not a reformist but a hate-driven, extremist world of ideas, everlastingly groping for anything which opposes Western civilization at its most radical level. Do not be surprised that many professional feminists sympathize with Islamic violence, the most woman-hating movement in the world today: they have a common enemy in Western civilization.
no subject
Yes, unfortunately, there are many that still do take him seriously and this isn't going to put a dent in his following. They stand in line daily for his show and they attend the university on his "campus". Hell, in his little world all he has to do is publicly ask Jesus for forgiveness and everything is honky dorey again ... a tear or two on camera wouldn't hurt either but that was a different
TV showTelevangelist.I respect his distinguished military service but I'm far from a fan of his particular flavor of Christianity and the same goes for almost all of his politics.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Which astounds me about that faction of the extreme religious right in America: they don't seem to do a lot of philanthropic deeds, or they can't fit them in with all their public appearances denouncing things like using 'happy holidays' as a seasonal greeting.
no subject
no subject
no subject
;)
Catholicism has its share of problems, but at least we don't have the real loonies.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Want examples? I can give you a few...
no subject