fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb

There once was an exquisitely beautiful actress called Laura Antonelli. She mostly wasted her beauty on smutty comedies for the lower end of the Italian market, but this is not important. What is interesting is this: she was born in Istria in 1941, when the peninsula was Italian. Her family fled the country in 1945, along with 300,000 other Italian-speakers, when it was surrendered to the Yugoslavs. She spent all her life in Italy, and when she did not speak Italian, she spoke the Venetian dialect of Italian (which is very pretty). Her father had been involved in the Italian (which, at the time, meant Fascist) government. Her original name was Antonaz, but that was all. And finally, Istria, where she comes from, has, even today, and in spite of being a part of Croatia and having suffered violent and largely unrecorded ethnic cleansing in 1945 and following years, an Italian majority.

So how does the New York Times describe her?

As a Yugoslav actress.

Suddenly I have a clear understanding of why American conservatives loathe this supposed newspaper of record.

Date: 2005-09-05 12:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
1)Yes.
2) Was he really the murderous bastard Shakespeare described, or was he the most fair and liberal king England ever had?

Date: 2005-09-05 01:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Go to [profile] patagonian's entry, where I have given an answer. He was certainly a murderous sod, but with excuses - and it was a murderous age. His vanquisher Henry VII was not much better - in his time, nearly every Duke in England was got rid of one way or another - and his successor Henry VIII infinitely worse, the worst king England or Britain ever had.

Date: 2005-09-05 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
Thanks, Fabio. You truely are the George Clooney of History :-)

Date: 2005-09-05 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Urgh, no thanks. I heartily dislike the man, and not being gay, am not even interested in his good looks.

Date: 2005-09-05 01:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Could we go back a bit and make it Cary Grant?

Anyway, it does not amount to much. I have a good library, designed on the principle that if I do not know something I like to have a book to refer back to. So, most times you ask me something about history, I can look it up somewhere.

Date: 2005-09-05 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
I'm fine with Cary Grant.

Date: 2005-09-05 06:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rfachir.livejournal.com
Arsenic and Old Lace!Cary or Notorious!Cary?

Date: 2005-09-05 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
The amazingly handsome and charismatic middle-aged man who, in CHARADE, looks perfectly right seducing a radiant young Audrey Hepburn. The dream of all men - especially those who are getting on a bit - to be, and of all straight women to meet.

Date: 2005-09-05 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rfachir.livejournal.com
*fans self* He's attractive enough to make anyone's True North waver a bit, that is certain.

Date: 2005-09-05 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
OMG, George Clooney is the vanquisher of Bill O'Reilly! I <33321 him like I love Sam Neill's voice and Tara Reid's drunken whoreness!

Date: 2005-09-06 09:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dreamer-marie.livejournal.com
What does "<33321" mean?

Date: 2005-09-06 11:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gunderpants.livejournal.com
Well, <3 is meant to look like a heart on its side. Overexcited AOL users below the age of 17 tend to add as many 3's to the end, probably to extend the wishing of love.

I added the other numbers to be a smartarse.

Date: 2013-09-19 10:39 pm (UTC)
ext_1059: (Agrippa)
From: [identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com
As a person of the female persuasion, I find no attraction in George Clooney whatsoever. He is Fakey of McFake cubed. He is a pale insult to the shade of Cary Grant, charmless and gormless.

Date: 2005-09-05 09:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bufo-viridis.livejournal.com
Here's June Diamanti essay about the man. Haven't read it through, but it looks quite extensive, although the conclusions should be yours.

Date: 2005-09-05 11:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
They are not. I'm afraid that she takes every piece of pro-Richard propaganda at face value, including the notion that the royal title of Edward V (the eldest of the Princes in the Tower) was compromised by a supposed pre-contract conveniently discovered by a time-serving Bishop as soon as Richard, as Lord Protector, had shown a desire for the crown. Just because an enemy (Henry Tudor and his descent) slandered you, it does not mean that you are not a murderer.

Date: 2005-09-05 11:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bufo-viridis.livejournal.com
*shrug*
I gave the warning, didn't I?

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 23rd, 2026 10:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios