Where Bush's culpability lies
Sep. 8th, 2005 08:21 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
This is what Robert Novak, an independent-minded but dyed-in-the-wool conservative commentator, had to say about the federal responsibilities on the Katrina disaster. It strikes me as a very fair and credible summary: http://www.townhall.com/columnists/robertnovak/printrn20050908.shtml
However, Novak does not notice one thing. This was not just any other governmental appointment. The Department of Homeland Security was Bush's own Big Idea, his gift to the nation. It was necessary, given that the US did not until then really have anything comparable to the Ministries of the Interior or Home Offices of other countries. And it was intended to deal with such present and major concernes as terrorism, international crime and natural disasters. So why did Bush nominate a couple of totally unqualified individuals such as Chertoff and Brown to run his own baby? Dammit, just as you are beginning to convince yourself that this President really has been as "misunderestimated" as he claims, he goes and does something so careless, amateurish, pointlessly stupid, as to nominate a totally unqualified person to run his own pet project.
EDIT:
patchworkmind pointed out to me that the Department of Homeland Security was not, in fact, Bush's idea, and that he resisted pressure from Congress for a while before giving in and setting up the post. This explains, at least, his apparently thinking so little of the post as to nominate an unqualified lawyer.
However, Novak does not notice one thing. This was not just any other governmental appointment. The Department of Homeland Security was Bush's own Big Idea, his gift to the nation. It was necessary, given that the US did not until then really have anything comparable to the Ministries of the Interior or Home Offices of other countries. And it was intended to deal with such present and major concernes as terrorism, international crime and natural disasters. So why did Bush nominate a couple of totally unqualified individuals such as Chertoff and Brown to run his own baby? Dammit, just as you are beginning to convince yourself that this President really has been as "misunderestimated" as he claims, he goes and does something so careless, amateurish, pointlessly stupid, as to nominate a totally unqualified person to run his own pet project.
EDIT:
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 08:29 am (UTC)19-Oct-02
Homeland Security
"While Bush embarks on a three-week-long fundraising and campaigning binge, Senator Daschle is keeping the United States Senate in overtime to get Homeland Security legislation passed. 'Unfortunately, devotion to a right-wing ideology and a grasp for political advantage are standing in the way of passing the Homeland Security bill. Republicans have voted five times to support the right-wing's filibuster of Homeland Security and deny an up or down vote on this legislation. The fact is that if the Senate Republicans would allow the Senate to vote on the Homeland Security bill, it would pass today. 'Congressman Armey's focus on this issue is clear. It was Democrats who proposed a Homeland Security Department over a year ago, and the Bush White House that opposed this effort for more than eight months. It was not until this summer, under pressure from the public, that the White House finally reversed its stance and agreed to support the creation of a Homeland Security Department."
from Democrats.com (http://archive.democrats.com/preview.cfm?term=Homeland%20Security) - I use these guys quite frequently to find out Democrat policy history. Bush got a lot of political flak for initially opposing creation of the cabinet-level department. He caved to public pressure, as usual.
Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 08:57 am (UTC)Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 10:22 am (UTC)As for Brown, the fuckwit in charge of FEMA... Don't even get me started. While not an impeachable offense by Bush, I certainly believe we should dock his pay for the rest of his term. Brown was something like the Director of the American Arabian Horse Owners Association, right? [smacks forehead] DOH!
Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 10:26 am (UTC)Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 11:00 am (UTC)Brown should just be fired and made ineligible for Unemployment Compensation. No COBRA. No severance pay. And he should not be allowed to work for the government. Ever. Even as a contractor or consultant. And people who do business with the government should lose their contracts with the government if he is in their employ.
And then Bush should be slapped, and he should be re-slapped on every anniversary of the day he appointed Brown to FEMA.
And we should fire Congress.
They had to approve Brown for the job.
Don't let those fuckers off either.
Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 11:44 am (UTC)(Incidentally, what would you do NO's Mayor and LA's Governor, and the other local authorities?)
Re: Bush did not originally want Homeland Security Dept.
Date: 2005-09-08 12:14 pm (UTC)Make them bail out the floordwaters with buckets with holes.
Make them live in the Superdome until it's demolished.
Let every evacuee have a chance to punch each of them square on the jaw.
Make them pay for every funeral.
Revoke their rights to vote and to free speech.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-08 12:16 pm (UTC)And Mr. Brown's to FEMA.
Congress is supposed to be a check on this kind of thing.