There is hope for this world yet
Dec. 9th, 2005 09:35 pmThe internet cafe where I go in the long wait for a phone line of my very own has a regular clientele of teen-agers who spend hours playing videogames. I am used to hearing them discuss their strategies and results aloud and with occasionally salty language.
Of course this language is mostly of the modern street variety, anything from "gay" to "motherf..."
Except that just now, a very small black lad right near me has used the literate, Popeian insult "dunce".
Of course this language is mostly of the modern street variety, anything from "gay" to "motherf..."
Except that just now, a very small black lad right near me has used the literate, Popeian insult "dunce".
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 09:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 09:50 am (UTC)Do you game?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 09:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:09 am (UTC)To do so is natural, human, and inescapable. We all do it, and I think that one unfortunate tendency of current trends in discourse on stereotype is that stereotypy is presented as a failing of the unworthy few, as opposed to a human tendency which is a fundamental part of how the brain works.
The little black boy lies at the intersection :-) of at least two areas of relative unfamiliarity for you, doesn't he?
I, however, come from a world in which the word "dunce" is completely unremarkable as a synonym for "fool". More humorous for us would have been "miscreant".
There are certainly good games and bad games, as with any other medium. Grand Theft Auto is in general a well-designed series, but its constant pandering to stereotype is somewhat wearying.
Do you listen to much rap?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:19 am (UTC)If that apology was indeed sincere, can we change the current direction of this exchange and work towards greater understanding instead?
I did not accuse you of racism. Even if I had, though, why should such a statement be grounds for my eviction?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:11 am (UTC)Just curious. I remain intrigued by this exchange. I'm not trying to condemn you.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:17 am (UTC)WAS
NOT
Unless you stop deliberately misreading what I wrote, you WILL be deleted and banned.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:20 am (UTC)We are both Christians with interest in a difficult topic. Can we not find a better way of dealing with this?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 10:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 11:07 am (UTC)You, in your own head, went from "stereotypy" to "racim" to "crime", with no particular help from me. This despite my careful clarification that stereotypy was a universal function of the workings of the human brain, and not something I was accusing you of unusual participation in. It's as if I asked you if you'd borrowed a pencil, and you became enraged and told me I'd accused you of rape and mugging, and angrily denied criminality. Yikes.
Pointless, really. Amusing at one level- I bring up the possibility of your preconceived notions, and the nascent discussion is completely derailed by your (other) preconceived notions.
Thanks for responding, and for your current attempt at politeness. If you wish to have actual open discussion on this topic at any time, I'm willing- just say the word.
In all fairness, this whole thing is testimony to the difficulty of the subject; but I feel strongly that such overcoming difficulty is both quite pragmatically possible, and ethically necessary.
cheers
adrian.