fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
- I never even bothered to read the article, but is this not the most mentally-challenged headline you've ever seen? http://www.townhall.com/Columnists/DougGiles/2008/03/01/would_christ_carry_a_concealed_weapon

Date: 2008-03-05 10:19 am (UTC)
filialucis: (Default)
From: [personal profile] filialucis
I ventured into the first screenful of that article. The body of it is even more brain-dead than the headline. Ugh.

Date: 2008-03-05 06:04 pm (UTC)
cheyinka: A sketch of a Metroid (eeek! a metroid!)
From: [personal profile] cheyinka
It's actually a question a real person supposedly asked the columnist. I'm not sure which is weirder: thinking "Would Christ carry a concealed weapon?!" is an appropriate counter-argument (he didn't enlist in the Roman armies, either, does that mean no one should enlist in their country's armed forces?) or writing an entire article saying that Jesus would personally have approved of carrying a concealed firearm if such had been invented at the time.

I have no problem with CCW or with someone using deadly force to defend themselves or those who are in danger, mind you, and I still think it's weird.

Date: 2008-03-05 07:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redcoast.livejournal.com
It's funnier if you add "In his pants!"

Date: 2008-03-05 07:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
That's gilding the lily.

Date: 2008-03-05 10:23 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-05 07:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamesenge.livejournal.com
It's pretty bad. To many people in the US, "Christ" is just a brand name that they are loyal to, like "Coke" or "Pepsi." The idea that this particular logo goes with a set of personal and ethical responsibilities that might sometimes even override the sacred Political Talking Point (holiest of American icons)... Well, some people are able to wrap their heads around this. Others, obviously, not.

Date: 2008-03-05 10:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrmandias.livejournal.com
Personally I think saying 'Christ is against concealed carry!' is just as stupid. Maybe you think the problem is only that Mr. Giles has got Christ wrong. I think the problem is that he's trivializing him.

Date: 2008-03-05 10:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamesenge.livejournal.com
If you think I wasn't objecting to the trivialization of Christ, you didn't read my words with any particular attention. If you want to quarrel, feel free to post something on my LiveJournal; I don't want to mess up [livejournal.com profile] fpb's.
Edited Date: 2008-03-05 10:51 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-03-05 10:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrmandias.livejournal.com
Whatever you say three times is true, so I concede the point.

Date: 2008-03-05 07:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bdunbar.livejournal.com
I'm upset at the picture in the article. Dude - that is NOT a safe way to carry a firearm.

Date: 2008-03-05 07:38 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
I assume that it is just picked off the shelves and empty, but yes, it is a rather queasy sort of picture, looking at it.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 08:13 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios