OTOH, if you have a delicate and temporary majority, compromising with the other side might make your actions less likely to be promptly overturned when the balance of power shifts.
And if you have a permanent majority, not caring about the opposition at all turns into tyranny of the majority. So I don't think it's that clear cut. Which isn't to say bipartisanship or compromise are always good things to strive for.
An interesting thing is that no less than eleven Democrat representatives voted against the bailout. In the circumstances, that was a brave thing to do.
no subject
And if you have a permanent majority, not caring about the opposition at all turns into tyranny of the majority. So I don't think it's that clear cut. Which isn't to say bipartisanship or compromise are always good things to strive for.
no subject