![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
If human folly and prejudice make you laugh, read this thread: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100004386/obamas-fat-surgeon-general-has-some-tough-questions-to-answer/ . It is the first discussion I have read in quite a while where it is difficult to find a good word to say for literally anyone involved in the debate. But a skilled comedian could turn into a Monty Pythonesque skit.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 08:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-24 12:01 am (UTC)Anyway, the cynic in me is asking why they find a fat woman intolerable for Surgeon General, when "do as I say, not as I do" is the ubiquitous law of politics.
In my own opinion, I think someone who struggles with his or her weight has MORE moral authority, not less, to tell me that it's important to try to exercise and eat well. This person KNOWS that it's not easy.
There's nothing more irritating than someone who dislikes the taste of alcohol preaching about the repugnance of drunks, or someone who has always had the metabolism of a hummingbird to belittle the obese.
As you know, I lost a lot of weight quickly because of illness. This kind of scenario was typical:
Person I Haven't Seen for Some Time: Wow, you look fabulous!
Me: Actually, I've been very sick. *wondering why no one seems to notice my waxy complexion or bags under my eyes*
Person: Oh. Well, you look GREAT!
Skinny uber alles!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 04:38 pm (UTC)Maybe if we could get some distance between health and aesthetics in this whole mess, something could be done. Saying that a subgroup (racial or not) has a genetic predisposition toward certain diseases and imbalances, while thoroughly debatable, at least won't get anyone hung; saying that a subgroup tends to be 'less pretty' stirs up the pot in the least-effective way possible.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 05:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-23 06:49 pm (UTC)