I can't believe this

[fpb]

Yesterday, Britain had one of its golden sporting days of all time. The World Athletics Championships closed with two more silver medals - with Britain winning many more than had been expected, and that in spite of the fact that the great Paula Radcliffe had not been able to take part - and, which tasted much sweeter in British mouths, the Australians were comprehensively beaten at cricket. Americans and other non-cricketing countries will not understand this, but "the Ashes" (as victory in an England-Australia cricket series is called, from an old and unimportant joke) is probably the greatest rivalry in all sports, and certainly of immense importance to Britain. In recent years, except for the epic Flintoff victory of a few years ago (on which I blogged at the time), England have been habitually pounded by the Australians. This time the shoe was very much on the other foot, and while the great Freddie Flintoff was clearly at the end of his physical form, he nevertheless managed one of the great moments of the triumph, a splendid throw from across the field that ran out the Australian captain, Ponting, just as Ponting looked like rescuing his side. It was, in short, the kind of victory of which people will be speaking in years (well, perhaps not in Australia).

So what is it that leaves me astounded and dumbfounded?

This. In any country, anywhere, under any circumstances, the local political leaders would have rushed to congratulate the heroes of athletics and cricket; both out of real pleasure in a great moment of national self-assertion and shared public happiness, and out of the instinctive desire to rub on some of the stardust of sporting triumph. (As a more than usually cynical Italian PM, Spadolini, said at the time of Italy's World Cup triumph of 1982, what matters is whether you are seen to have luck.) Even if you are not a fan, indeed even if sports bore you, it is simply political commonsense to be seen to share in the joy of the commons; and the Queen, this time, was the first to do so.

So where were her Prime Minister and his government?

Nowhere.

I have rarely seen such a devastating demonstration of Gordon Brown's, and of his party's, complete and utter lack of contact or empathy with the people they are supposed to represent.

Comments

[annie-from-aust.livejournal.com]

strangely enough, the loss of the Ashes to England in the Cricket has not been given a lot of coverage here....

However the radio DJ said that Ricky Ponting also lost the Miss World Contest. ha ha ha

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gordon Brown should have the entire England cricket team around for afternoon tea. It wouldn't kill him, the dour Scot.

Our former PM John Howard practically humped their legs, wore Australian green and gold track suit at all times, He was what we call a "Cricket Tragic" ie fanatic follower

[annie-from-aust.livejournal.com]

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/sport/cricket/

here's some coverage of latest tragedy LOL

[fpb.livejournal.com]

Um... Perhaps it is just possible that this year's England were just unusually good?

[annie-from-aust.livejournal.com]

you are correct, for the last 40 years the smug Australian sporting media have been such poor sports that my family choses to barrack for any team that Australia is playing against. So we are happy today ! Quietly happy.

[fpb.livejournal.com]

Mind you, the British media are not much better. I don't know if you were on my f-list at the time of the last World Cup, but I had a thing or two to say about BBC coverage...

[fpb.livejournal.com]

Oh, and to be fair, Mr.Brown is away from the country on holiday. But he could at least have made a public statement. As it is, thus far all we have had is a squeak from a junior Minister for Sports - and, of course, the Queen.

Oh, no, no.

[wemyss.livejournal.com]

Jonah Brrrrroooooun MUST stay well away from the England side. It's a recurrent problem: all that's wanted to doom, well, anyone, in sport or not, is for the one-eyed son of the manse to endorse them.

Vide http://order-order.com/2009/08/23/congratulations-to-the-english-cricket-team/.

Re: Oh, no, no.

[fpb.livejournal.com]

Well, as Mr. Spadolini whom I mentioned above said, what matters is to be seen to be lucky. Would you say that Mr.Brown is? 8-)

Re: Oh, no, no.

[fpb.livejournal.com]

After all, the same is true for the BBC. As I pointed out three years ago, we owe them our triumph in the last World Cup. If the BBC commentators had not been atrociously down on Italy and treated us as no-hopers at every turn, no doubt we would never have won the Cup. Some people bring good luck to the opposition.
http://fpb.livejournal.com/186433.html
http://fpb.livejournal.com/189717.html

[annie-from-aust.livejournal.com]

they LOVE Gordon Jonah Brown ,,,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K49FVMBOLr4

[pathology-doc.livejournal.com]

It was, in short, the kind of victory of which people will be speaking in years (well, perhaps not in Australia).

Oh, we'll be speaking of it all right. Just not in the sort of language one should use in front of small children. ;)

Everyone gets their turn at the top eventually, and Australia's has been quite long - perhaps over-long. Have been brushing up on the Napoleonic Wars lately (R.F. Delderfield's The March of the Twenty-Six), and the parallels are interesting - a formerly invincible side gradually finds itself struggling to win victories that used to come with contemptuous ease; then it drops the odd hard-fought contest here and there; then it is convincingly beaten on occasion; and finally it is toppled from its pedestal.

Unfortunately, unlike the Schneider Trophy air races of the 1930s, there's no holding of the trophy in perpetuity for the side which wins X contests consecutively. Eventual defeat is inevitable!

[fishlivejournal.livejournal.com]

oh, it'll be talked about in OZ for years to come :/

Enjoy the celebrations! And remember the missing voices next election.

[fpb.livejournal.com]

To be fair, he has now been heard from. Only two days after the country exploded. (The victory led the BBC and ITV news, ahead of everything else, and was front page on most newspapers.)