![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I never did like the land of banks and... banks; tell me whether I have no reason. Everyone knows that Roman Polanski's conviction for child sex in 1978 was a scandal, arranged by a publicity-hungry, corrupt judge who connived with the prosecution in defiance of all law. Not that Polanski was an angel, but even prosecution lawyers have since admitted that the trial was what Bob Dylan would have called a "pig-circus", and that a much more lenient sentence would have been just. So when Polanski fled to France, the US authorities did not make any real effort to have him extradited. Everyone concerned with the trial was ashamed. Now, thirty-one years after the show-trial, the Swiss authorities, for reasons best known to themselves, have entrapped Polanski into visiting Switzerland for a cinema festival and arrested him on the 31-year-old warrant. I am no fan of men who have sex with minors, but this stinks. The Swiss would do better to arrest their own villains, like the filth who murders for hire in the so-called Dignity clinic. And let's not even get on their banking business.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 03:56 pm (UTC)edit: I see he only confessed to "unlawful sex with a minor"; that he gave her quaaludes and champagne and raped her was her testimony.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:05 pm (UTC)The arrest followed a request by the United States that Switzerland apprehend Polanski. U.S. investigators had learned of his planned trip several days earlier, which had given them enough time to negotiate with Swiss authorities and lay the groundwork for an arrest. The United States had been seeking his arrest and extradition worldwide since 2005. While there had been a U.S. arrest warrant for him since 1978 and he had been on the Interpol "red notice" wanted list for several years,[58] an international arrest warrant was issued in 2005.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Polanski#Sex_crime_conviction
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:18 pm (UTC)And yes, she doesn't want the attention of another trial, but the law often doesn't do what a victim wants, once it has evidence. It's not just about her, it's about punishing people for raping 13 year old girls. Even the rich and popular can't always escape.
Why are you defending a rapist?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:44 pm (UTC)Previous attempts to nab Polanski when he left France were thwarted because authorities didn't learn of his travel soon enough — or Polanski didn't make the trip, said William Sorukas, chief of the U.S. Marshals Service's domestic investigations branch.
"This is not the first time we have done this over the years," said Sandi Gibbons, spokeswoman for the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. She said warrants had been sent out whenever rumors circulated that he would be traveling to a country outside France.
As for Gstaad vs. Zurich:
http://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/front.html?siteSect=105&ty=st&ref=fb&sid=11287917
I'm not sure why hypocrisy trumps justice for rape and fleeing.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:57 pm (UTC)A few months after
Date: 2010-07-14 01:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-30 04:10 pm (UTC)