Date: 2011-09-09 11:02 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabethea.livejournal.com
three athletes have already crossed the line", s/he only ever means that the rest of the field will soon follow them

Not necessarily; it might be followed by "and five others have dropped out, leaving six still to finish".

Indeed, if we take what I said: "It does with some religions already"... that actual sentence could finish "and it looks like three more religions are going that way as well, which might mean that Christianity became left as the only religion who could perform legal marriages".

Or, indeed "It does with some religions already; however, that may be subject to change in the near future".

Either of these are potential meanings, and neither end up with your version of events :) It suggests that things are subject to change - but it doesn't specifically make any predictions of the direction in which that change might happen.

ETA
Also, though - why be aggressive? If you acknowledge that it's an aggressive comment - why make it? The argument didn't need it.
Edited Date: 2011-09-09 11:13 am (UTC)

Date: 2011-09-09 11:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
You did not add any such specification, however, which means that the meaning of the sentence remains as I constructed it.

Date: 2011-09-09 11:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabethea.livejournal.com
Nonsense. If a commentator said "welcome to a game, and both sides have already scored" there would be no implication that there might be further scores. You made an assumption which you are now defending in linguistic terms... after telling me you're a terrible linguist.

Date: 2011-09-09 11:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
"both sides have already scored" is not the same kind of statement as "some religious bodies already have gay marriage". It is only comparable in that the goals already scored are final events, that cannot be revoked or altered. When you say that "some religious bodies have already accepted gay marriage", you mention only one thing that has already taken place, that is final, that cannot be altered; the one thing that you do not anticipate is that the score might in any way change against that particular decision.

Date: 2011-09-09 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabethea.livejournal.com
If I have "already bought a television", it does not mean I have a television for eternity! The damn thing will break at some point and I may not buy a new one. Equally, the damn law may change and I may have different rights.

Date: 2011-09-09 06:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
That was not what you said.

Date: 2011-09-09 07:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sabethea.livejournal.com
Incidentally, I have come to the following conclusion:

If aggression is needed to defend your argument, you do not have a good argument.

If aggression is not needed but you use it anyway, you do not have a good arguer.

Date: 2011-09-09 07:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
And if I allow you to define me, I am indeed not a good arguer. Incidentally, you just said that Jesus, Demosthenes and Cicero were not good arguers.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 02:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios