fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
[livejournal.com profile] inverarity has paid me off for proving that he had produced a mendacious and morally repulsive piece of writing by barring me altogether from entering his LJ even as a silent lurker. I guess being outed as a liar must hurt. The one thing he has not done, however, is say a single thing in defence of his horrible review, let alone acknowledge my criticism. Alas, being a writer of genius does seem, in his case, compatible with being a manhoodless coward and liar by omission and commission.

I shouldn't say this? Well, if I don't, who will? And certain cowardly, hypocritical and vicious forms of behaviour are in dire need of exposure.

EDITED IN: the culprit himself left the following excuse in the comments, deleting it afterwards: I banned you from posting for your behavior on my LJ, not for anything you said about me. I have no idea what you mean by "banned you from lurking." If you can't even see my posts any more, that's a change LiveJournal made, not me. So the fact that it came after my opinion of your review - to which you still haven't given one word of comment - is purely coincidental? Look, you may try to make us believe that the Sun rises in the west, you may try to make us believe water is dry, you may try to make us believe debt is good for us, but don't try to make us believe that. And I will add a suggestion, purely out of the kindness of my heart: when one is in a hole (and a man who has been shown to have lied about the contents of a book he reviewed may reasonably be said to be in a hole), it is considered a sound norm to stop digging, or at least not to dig with quite such enthusiasm. After all, if you lied about Bradley, what else could you be lying about?

Date: 2011-09-18 01:21 am (UTC)
ext_402500: (Default)
From: [identity profile] inverarity.livejournal.com
I banned you from posting for your behavior on my LJ, not for anything you said about me. I have no idea what you mean by "banned you from lurking." If you can't even see my posts any more, that's a change LiveJournal made, not me.

Date: 2011-09-18 03:40 am (UTC)
ext_402500: (Default)
From: [identity profile] inverarity.livejournal.com
How can you claim I deleted my previous comment when I can still see it? Both the owner of the LJ and the poster can see a screened comment when it's screened. Or did you not know that?

I suppose you are going to claim you can't read this? (http://inverarity.livejournal.com/97766.html)

Date: 2011-09-18 05:10 am (UTC)
ext_402500: (Default)
From: [identity profile] inverarity.livejournal.com
You screened the comments. I didn't. Do you not understand that only the owner of an LJ can screen comments on it? It showed 0 entries because it doesn't count screened comments.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 16th, 2025 08:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios