![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...AS FAMOUS AS THOSE OF WASHINGTON AND LINCOLN? WHY ARE THERE NO MONUMENTS TO HER IN THE CENTRE OF AMERICAN CITIES? WHY DOES SHE NOT HAVE A DAY DEDICATED TO HER??
I am an opponent of "positive discrimination"; and while I love the study of history in all its forms, I detest the motives why black history or women's history is pushed on us. But in this age of all ages, when these things are popular and approved, can anyone think of a reason why a woman whose whole life is one long record of endurance, heroism, fighting for the right with no limit and no reward, never taking a penny for herself when her people owed her so much, is not mentioned in one breath with Garibaldi and Lincoln and Gandhi the men of Marathon and Salamis and every hero and heroine of freedom? And why do Americans, who are certainly not shy of praising and promoting the heroes of their nation, barely seem to know the name of Harriet Tubman?
This is an extract from the introduction to her first biography: the first edition of this story, under the title of "Harriet Tubman," was written in the greatest possible haste, while the writer was preparing for a voyage to Europe. There was pressing need for this book, to save the poor woman's little home from being sold under a mortgage, and letters and facts were penned down rapidly, as they came in. The book has now been in part re-written and the letters and testimonials placed in an appendix.
For the satisfaction of the incredulous (and there will naturally be many such, when so strange a tale is repeated to them), I will here state that so far as it has been possible, I have received corroboration of every incident related to me by my heroic friend. I did this for the satisfaction of others, not for my own. No one can hear Harriet talk, and not believe every word she says. As Mr. Sanborn says of her, "she is too real a person, not to be true."
Many incidents quite as wonderful as those related in the story, I have rejected, because I had no way in finding the persons who could speak to their truth.
This woman was the friend of William H. Seward, of Gerritt Smith, of Wendell Phillips, of William Lloyd Garrison, and of many other distinguished philanthropists before the War, as of very many officers of the Union Army during the conflict.
After her almost superhuman efforts in making her own escape from slavery, and then returning to the South nineteen times, and bringing away with her over three hundred fugitives, she was sent by Governor Andrew of Massachusetts to the South at the beginning of the War, to act as spy and scout for our armies, and to be employed as hospital nurse when needed.
Here for four years she labored without any remuneration, and during the time she was acting as nurse, never drew but twenty days' rations from our Government. She managed to support herself, as well as to take care of the suffering soldiers.
Secretary Seward exerted himself in every possible way to procure her a pension from Congress, but red-tape proved too strong even for him, and her case was rejected, because it did not come under any recognized law.
The first edition of this little story was published through the liberality of Gerritt Smith, Wendell Phillips, and prominent men in Auburn, and the object for which it was written was accomplished. But that book has long been out of print, and the facts stated there are all unknown to the present generation. There have, I am told, often been calls for the book, which could not be answered, and I have been urged by many friends as well as by Harriet herself, to prepare another edition. For another necessity has arisen and she needs help again not for herself, but for certain helpless ones of her people.
Her own sands are nearly run, but she hopes, 'ere she goes home, to see this work, a hospital, well under way. Her last breath and her last efforts will be spent in the cause of those for whom she has already risked so much. Her last effort was, in fact, to set up and put on a sound founding a rest-house for elderly blacks in New York City; and for once, she had a little reward for her efforts, since that was the place where she died. But I say that her memory should be celebrated with drums and trumpets, and that her name should be one of those that sound to every decent human being like a moral call, like a reminder of what human beings can be.
I am an opponent of "positive discrimination"; and while I love the study of history in all its forms, I detest the motives why black history or women's history is pushed on us. But in this age of all ages, when these things are popular and approved, can anyone think of a reason why a woman whose whole life is one long record of endurance, heroism, fighting for the right with no limit and no reward, never taking a penny for herself when her people owed her so much, is not mentioned in one breath with Garibaldi and Lincoln and Gandhi the men of Marathon and Salamis and every hero and heroine of freedom? And why do Americans, who are certainly not shy of praising and promoting the heroes of their nation, barely seem to know the name of Harriet Tubman?
This is an extract from the introduction to her first biography: the first edition of this story, under the title of "Harriet Tubman," was written in the greatest possible haste, while the writer was preparing for a voyage to Europe. There was pressing need for this book, to save the poor woman's little home from being sold under a mortgage, and letters and facts were penned down rapidly, as they came in. The book has now been in part re-written and the letters and testimonials placed in an appendix.
For the satisfaction of the incredulous (and there will naturally be many such, when so strange a tale is repeated to them), I will here state that so far as it has been possible, I have received corroboration of every incident related to me by my heroic friend. I did this for the satisfaction of others, not for my own. No one can hear Harriet talk, and not believe every word she says. As Mr. Sanborn says of her, "she is too real a person, not to be true."
Many incidents quite as wonderful as those related in the story, I have rejected, because I had no way in finding the persons who could speak to their truth.
This woman was the friend of William H. Seward, of Gerritt Smith, of Wendell Phillips, of William Lloyd Garrison, and of many other distinguished philanthropists before the War, as of very many officers of the Union Army during the conflict.
After her almost superhuman efforts in making her own escape from slavery, and then returning to the South nineteen times, and bringing away with her over three hundred fugitives, she was sent by Governor Andrew of Massachusetts to the South at the beginning of the War, to act as spy and scout for our armies, and to be employed as hospital nurse when needed.
Here for four years she labored without any remuneration, and during the time she was acting as nurse, never drew but twenty days' rations from our Government. She managed to support herself, as well as to take care of the suffering soldiers.
Secretary Seward exerted himself in every possible way to procure her a pension from Congress, but red-tape proved too strong even for him, and her case was rejected, because it did not come under any recognized law.
The first edition of this little story was published through the liberality of Gerritt Smith, Wendell Phillips, and prominent men in Auburn, and the object for which it was written was accomplished. But that book has long been out of print, and the facts stated there are all unknown to the present generation. There have, I am told, often been calls for the book, which could not be answered, and I have been urged by many friends as well as by Harriet herself, to prepare another edition. For another necessity has arisen and she needs help again not for herself, but for certain helpless ones of her people.
Her own sands are nearly run, but she hopes, 'ere she goes home, to see this work, a hospital, well under way. Her last breath and her last efforts will be spent in the cause of those for whom she has already risked so much. Her last effort was, in fact, to set up and put on a sound founding a rest-house for elderly blacks in New York City; and for once, she had a little reward for her efforts, since that was the place where she died. But I say that her memory should be celebrated with drums and trumpets, and that her name should be one of those that sound to every decent human being like a moral call, like a reminder of what human beings can be.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 12:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 12:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 03:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 03:42 pm (UTC)I think why she is not mentioned in the same breath with those people is that her work at the time of it was by necessity clandestine. She was not rallying people to her cause; other people rallied around her later in her life.
The people who get on money or get days are all pretty much of the public figure from the get go type: Susan B Anthony, MLK, etc. The only exception I can think of is Sacajawea, and in her case I think it's the romance of the story, the mythic grandeur of her presenting her newborn to the Pacific Ocean etc. For a very young country, it's nice to have those kinds of myths, and if they're based on truth, all the better.
FWIW, I had to think for a minute before I remembered who Garibaldi was precisely.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 03:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 03:13 am (UTC)Tubman's cause at the beginning was not just controversial but against the law of the land, and the change in public attitude was gradual. By the time her cause received near-universal public acclaim, she was a century dead, and not only she but many others in the greater cause of black emancipation were sort of grouped together. I think most Americans think of Tubman as one of a host of abolitionists.
To sum up, I don't think it was necessarily these qualities of tirelessness etc that made Bl. Teresa famous. She is one of the select (possibly the hardest to acheive) coterie of celebrity saint. Hardest to achieve because celebrity is full of potential corruption. To me, her fame is kind of incidental.
To be one whom the world loves is always dangerous, right?
I wrote this comment in robbed bits and pieces of time over the day so I hope it makes sense.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-26 04:03 pm (UTC)He also fought for liberty in half a dozen countries, of course, but educated people know all about that. Garibaldi was notoriously anti-clerical and anti-Catholic, and yet the stature of the man was such that his entry in the Italian Catholic Encyclopedia starts with "Hero".
no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 03:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 06:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 02:27 pm (UTC)I certainly agree that she could be more famous. I feel the same way about Frederick Douglas. If you have never read his autobiography, it is really worth it. Tubman, and probably Douglas, too, get a boost here nowadays because February is Black History Month, and schools want to study the famous figures who fit into that catagory.
My son's entire class went on a campout recently. One of the activities they had was an Underground Railroad game...in honor of Tubman, of course.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 04:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 08:37 pm (UTC)Very few monuments to poor single childless women
Date: 2011-11-27 06:32 pm (UTC)I found a few statues of Tubman on the internet when I looked for the one I knew in Boston(http://www.teachervision.fen.com/african-american-history/historic-sites/4554.html)
Another in New York City:
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/13/why-is-harriet-tubman-facing-south/
And a church saved her New York home as a historic site:
http://www.nyhistory.com/harriettubman/life.htm
My girlfriend lives in Maryland where she was born, and said there was a marker at Tubman's birthplace, but it isn't an historic site http://www.flickr.com/photos/harry_hunt/4093517097/.
Re: Very few monuments to poor single childless women
Date: 2011-11-27 09:14 pm (UTC)(shakes head)
Don't be vexed
Date: 2011-11-27 10:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 11:02 pm (UTC)I learned about her in primary school, and that is about it. And as much as she was lauded then, this does
not give her the credit she deserves. Not even close.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 11:20 pm (UTC)Many Americans are automatically suspicious of any woman or black person who is lauded by historians or activists as a hero; if she was that important, wouldn't I have heard of her? It thus becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; attempts to educate are seen as attempts to indoctrinate, and there's already a wide-spread assumption that the accomplishments of minorities must be exaggerated, anyway.
Also, Tubman was definitely more of a doer than a talker/writer, and she didn't (as far as I'm aware . . .) leave a body of quotable speeches or essays that make for easy inclusion in textbooks or soundbites. As opposed to e.g. Sojourner Truth, who, I'd say, is much more well-known due in no small part to her quotability.
Incidentally, I've known of Tubman since I was a child, and I was definitely taught of her in school; this was in a state which didn't exist during the Civil War, so one may safely assume nationwide rather than regional educational biases regarding the era.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-27 11:22 pm (UTC)