Political Correctness and story writing
Dec. 4th, 2011 09:47 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fpbI just watched the first two minutes of a BBC show, and then turned it off because I knew exactly how it would end. The show was Garrow's Law, and it opened with a mob murdering someone during an election. Since Garrow is a heroic lawyer, we know that he will uncover the facts behind the mobbing; and what convinced me to give it up was the way the camera panned in through the mob to point to one bystander - the obvious candidate to be the crucial and heroic witness who leads Garrow to the truth. And the witness was black; the only black there. Once I had seen that, I knew the whole story.
Then I found myself thinking. And I realized that, just as I had seen this kind of death-dealing obviousness and preachiness in products of the modern media industry, I don't think I had ever seen it in fanfics. I have seen terrible fanfics; I have seen fanfics - most of them, I would say - that featured viewpoints I disliked, even disliked violently; but I don't think I can remember a single fanfic that proceeded by this kind of box-ticking predictability - murderous white mob? - check; innocent black whose decency and truthfulness will solve the issue? - check. I have seen fics whose authors I would have been glad to shake till they rattled; fics whose wrong-headedness, whose political or religious parti pris, made me sick; but if I have read anything that was so obviously predictable and foredoomed to move along the same lines and make the same points, it was because of the writer's lack of skill. It certainly was not because of any determination to take the story through certain predetermined points. In fact, fics whose implicit politics infuriated me were nonetheless a lot less offensive to me than this BBC production, although I would actually support a good deal of its views of history and values. It was the sheer dreary obviousness, the box-ticking predictability of it all, that offended me to the point of stopping the program within two minutes of the start.
What I am trying to say is that the ruinous effect of Political Correctness on writing - especially writing for Hollywood and TV - is not an expression of the zeitgeist or of anything that individuals, misguided or not, might want to say off their own bat. I have seen fics whose values I wanted to shred like confetti, but nobody who writes fics throws in, say, a good black character, just because there is a box somewhere that says "good black character", "corrupt white establishment" and the many other similar cliches are obliged points through which the story should go. In other words, the really poisonous, story-killing variety of PC is not a feature of individual writers' imagination. When left to themselves, even the most radical writers don't write that way.
It is a function of the corporate mind; of the corporate timidity, the corporate need to be seen to be on the right side in anything that pressure groups are sensitive about, the need not to draw certain negative terms to oneself. Writers who are writing for themselves, to please themselves and their readers, don't write like that. They may be perverse, stupid, prejudiced, or sick; but they don't tick boxes.
Then I found myself thinking. And I realized that, just as I had seen this kind of death-dealing obviousness and preachiness in products of the modern media industry, I don't think I had ever seen it in fanfics. I have seen terrible fanfics; I have seen fanfics - most of them, I would say - that featured viewpoints I disliked, even disliked violently; but I don't think I can remember a single fanfic that proceeded by this kind of box-ticking predictability - murderous white mob? - check; innocent black whose decency and truthfulness will solve the issue? - check. I have seen fics whose authors I would have been glad to shake till they rattled; fics whose wrong-headedness, whose political or religious parti pris, made me sick; but if I have read anything that was so obviously predictable and foredoomed to move along the same lines and make the same points, it was because of the writer's lack of skill. It certainly was not because of any determination to take the story through certain predetermined points. In fact, fics whose implicit politics infuriated me were nonetheless a lot less offensive to me than this BBC production, although I would actually support a good deal of its views of history and values. It was the sheer dreary obviousness, the box-ticking predictability of it all, that offended me to the point of stopping the program within two minutes of the start.
What I am trying to say is that the ruinous effect of Political Correctness on writing - especially writing for Hollywood and TV - is not an expression of the zeitgeist or of anything that individuals, misguided or not, might want to say off their own bat. I have seen fics whose values I wanted to shred like confetti, but nobody who writes fics throws in, say, a good black character, just because there is a box somewhere that says "good black character", "corrupt white establishment" and the many other similar cliches are obliged points through which the story should go. In other words, the really poisonous, story-killing variety of PC is not a feature of individual writers' imagination. When left to themselves, even the most radical writers don't write that way.
It is a function of the corporate mind; of the corporate timidity, the corporate need to be seen to be on the right side in anything that pressure groups are sensitive about, the need not to draw certain negative terms to oneself. Writers who are writing for themselves, to please themselves and their readers, don't write like that. They may be perverse, stupid, prejudiced, or sick; but they don't tick boxes.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Thought Prison
Date: 2011-12-05 08:45 pm (UTC)Is anybody safe?
However, there is no safety for members of the ruling elite in a system of political correctness; anyone at all is susceptible to denunciation for any reason or no reason at any time. Whatever you may do, whatever willing you may show, status is contingent.
Since PC is a wave of moral 'progress' which leaves behind all previous moral standards and behaviours – there can be no accumulation of moral capital.
This applies to the ultra-PC just as much as to the openly reactionary.
*
(In this respect PC is more like communist than fascist totalitarianism: under fascism membership of and "courageous loyalty to" the in-group usually brings safety from denunciation; but under communism anybody was vulnerable to denunciation – friends and enemies of the government alternated with bewildering rapidity: nobody was safe.)
Indeed, the PC elite seem especially vulnerable to denunciation – since they are under continuous scrutiny; it is hard to keep-up with the pace of change, and the change is so arbitrary; it is very difficult to suppress common sense 24/7.
The highest member of the PC elite is only a single gaffe away from disaster.
*
(Note: A "gaffe" is when an elite PC intellectual momentarily forgets to lie.)
*
Under political correctness, you are only as good as today's match between your communications and the ever-changing societal symbols of virtue.
PC assumes that (as an elite intellectual) your motivations are bad unless proven good – and motivations cannot be proven.
You may advertise your good motivations relentlessly – daily, hourly – but you cannot ever prove conclusively, against hostile skepticism, that you are deep-down and overall a fully PC (hence decent) person.
(Not least because it is very unlikely that you are a decent person – after all, who is?).
*
All of this means that a politically correct social diktat can (from whatever cause – such as elite competition, the need for a scapegoat, or the whim of the media) arbitrarily decide at any time to stop giving you the benefit of the intrinsic doubt; and then you will be helpless, isolated, stripped of all moral status, a marked-man, a legitimate target of self-righteous aggression.
*
Because, after all, you are guilty – everybody is.
And scapegoats are sometimes necessary: tough luck that it happened to be you.