fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
This election has already given us a historic moment; a moment which, I think, may well feature in future histories, become the centre of scholarly debate, and perhaps even be remembered as one of those factoids that everyone remembers about historical figures - like Pontius Pilate washing his hands, or Washington's troops starving at Valley Forge, or the fat figure and six wives of Henry VIII.

No, I don't mean the debate, although the results of the debate may well come to connect themselves with the event I mean. The event I mean is the publication, by the Obama campaign, of the following blog entry:



This is incredible. If it means anything, it means that the Republicans, if elected, would engage in a campaign of tearing out uteri from living women.

I think I can say with a clean conscience that no campaign ever stooped this low. This is a record, and, I would say, probably unsurpassable. My friends who are historians and know what I am talking about can make the mental experiment: project yourselves into the minds of Julius Streicher or Gabriele d'Annunzio. Try to imagine Streicher saying that about Jews, or d'Annunzio about democratic politicians. You can't. You know you can't. They would not think of it; and if they did, they, even they, would laugh at it as at a crazy joke. The evident and rather unpleasant sexualness of the enclosed drawing, featuring a lightly-dressed, apparently underaged young lady with her clothes being blown all over by the wind - the very image of the worst kind of irresponsible male fantasies - makes the thing even worse: it as good as invites women to identify with this near-paedophile fantasy image, and to imagine that there is something there that is worth something for women to keep and that it threatens women to lose. The abyss of abjection in the association of visual idea and depraved gag literally challenges description and analysis.

This does, of course, confirm my old belief that abortion is the central issue and the driving force of so much that seems unhinged and bewildering about modern politics. But it also suggests a desperacy lurking somewhere below the confident gloss of Obaman politics; as though these people felt the breath of the Avenger of Blood breathing over their neck, and feared it even where the rest of us can't begin to feel any presence except theirs. It is like the crazed language of British medical bodies on the subject of abortion - language that a child would know was insane. But it also suggests an essential hollowness at the heart of the Obaman message. If that is the sort of thing they resort to, they must feel they have exhausted every other weapon. Now, add this to the effect of Romney's definite victory in last night's debate, and see what you get.

Date: 2012-10-05 04:10 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jordan179.livejournal.com
I think the picture is actually from the 1920's, of a flapper (aka "Bright Young Thing") and they've cropped out the object at which she was waving. Your other points stand.

Date: 2012-10-05 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
I have, elsewhere on this discussion space, mentioned that it was a pseudo-innocent twenties-style image. My point is about the selection of such a flagrant and dubious male fantasy image as the idea of women's rights being defended.

Date: 2012-10-05 09:39 am (UTC)
filialucis: (Pascal)
From: [personal profile] filialucis
Agreed. Even before I began seeing it in specifically Catholic terms, I always thought that in this area women's "rights" and "liberation" was bought at the price of women's dignity, and that the price was too high.

What I think of that price now, I'm sure you can imagine.

Date: 2012-10-05 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
The visual image struck me more, probably, than it would have done another person, because I have a moderately unusual fixation with female heroines - I could quote a few male authors who do, but most don't - and I am very sensitive to the idea of dignified and heroic female presence. To me, the graphics of this item spoke as much as the language.

Date: 2012-10-05 10:03 am (UTC)
filialucis: (Pascal)
From: [personal profile] filialucis
Are you on Skype or Google Talk? I've disabled comments on my LiveJournal because these days it contains nothing but crossposts from Dreamwidth and I prefer to have all my comments in one place, but not everyone on LJ is willing to log into DW via OpenID. There's an issue I'd like to run by a Catholic male at some point (not today because there are too many disruptions happening here right now), and if possible I'd prefer a less public forum in which to do it.

Date: 2012-10-05 10:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Skype fabiopbarbieri. Call me some time this afternoon.

Date: 2012-10-05 10:55 am (UTC)
filialucis: (Pascal)
From: [personal profile] filialucis
I'll try (disruptive workmen in the office permitting), but it'll be a text chat; I don't think my wifi is up to voice and I can't access the internet by any other means until the construction work is done. Thanks!

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 09:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios