1. Comment with any subject that you would like me to rant on. (Note that I may not have an opinion on your subject, and if I do, it might be different from yours.)
2. Watch my journal for your rant.
3. Post this in your own journal, so that you may rant for others.
2. Watch my journal for your rant.
3. Post this in your own journal, so that you may rant for others.
and here's the rest...
Date: 2005-01-28 08:18 am (UTC)They take the worst features of mankind and make money out of it. They exploit the masochistic need of the protagonists to show that they exist at all, and the voyeurism of a public that wishes to see things that debase them (as the debasing of a human being debases us all). Personally, I find the processes involved so vile that I have never managed to bring myself to watch more than a piece of an episode, and that was in Italy where it involved a beautiful actress I had had a crush on long ago. And I watched the rest of the celebs involved gang up on her and force out. This is the sort of behaviour these shows encourage.
Catholic doctrine vs. Protestant doctrine
Well, how can I speak of that which does not exist? There is no doctrine that a Protestant body has not held or denied at some point; there even are bodies like the Jehova's Witnesses and the Mormons, who, while visibly Protestant, are not actually Christian at all. Protestantism is not a doctrine: it is an attitude. It is the attitude of the person who, coming upon a doctrine or religious practice which s/he does not understand, immediately declares it unsound. On the other hand, Catholicism certainly is a doctrine. It is even too much of one, as anyone who has a look of the Catechism of the Catholic Church knows. But it is also an attitude: the attitude of someone who, having inherited a huge body of doctrine developed by a community of saints and sages down twenty centuries, even where s/he does not understand or even sympathize, accepts it on the witness of the Church (i.e. of our shared historical past). It follows, by the way, that, now that the Protestant churches have existed for centuries, there are a lot of Protestants - perhaps the majority - who have the Catholic attitude of trust in the common past, if not the Catholic doctrine.
people who can only speak one language
Of course, it may not be your choice. It may be a misfortune. But if it is a matter of choice (as it is, for instance, for the majority of Britons), then it is rude to the majority of the world, arrogant, and profoundly self-damaging. To speak another language is not only to have an extra instrument, but to be open to a slightly different way of seeing the world, to new experiences, and last but not least to new people. And it is nice. My German is nothing to write home about, but I will never forget the bright, incredulous, grateful smile of a group of German tourists in Rome, when I answered a question from them in a few broken words of their own language.
Re: and here's the rest...
Date: 2005-01-28 11:57 am (UTC)And I couldn't agree more on the subject of reality TV shows. Big Brother, a fascinating psychological experiment? Give me a bucket.
Re: and here's the rest...
Date: 2005-01-28 05:48 pm (UTC)Actually, the whole passage was addressed largely to myself.