![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
fpbAllow me a little expression of hatred. Of all the categories of brute in the world, I hold a special loathing for union-busters. Given two bullets and the choice of an abortionist, Robert Mugabe, or a union-buster, I would shoot the union-buster, twice, to make sure. The monstrous intellectual perversion that pretends that employees should negotiate alone by themselves with employers who hold the power of whole cities, whole nations, and calls this defending freedom, is something that is very far beyond my ability to imagine, let alone to sympathize with.
The article I include is by a union-buster. And proud of it, the bastard. A former American senator with the ridiculous name of Malcolm Wallop (one might say that God sometimes gets his retribution in in advance - why is it that so many unpleasant people have ridiculous names, John Spong, Kevin Naff, Malcolm Wallop?). So I recommend that you read the following article as you would a note from your worst enemy, with the due interpretative attitude.
Lost in the summer news shuffle of judicial nominations and social
security reform spins a fascinating story with tremendous long-term
significance. It is the deepening rift between the Service Employees
International Union (SEIU) and the 800-pound American Federation of
Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO).
Union strife is nothing new; followers of union politics know that
membership is in decline. In fact, I admittedly watched with
satisfaction as their numbers first began slipping during my three
terms as a United States Senator from 1976-1994 representing the
nearly union-free state of Wyoming.
Now moving into the new century many of my free-market, free-trade
colleagues and I relish in the continued decline. There is, however,
one notable exception in the increasingly powerful SEIU. Now the
nation’s largest union, SEIU bucks the trend by engaging in slick,
heavy-handed intimidation campaigns and by targeting less-skilled,
low-wage workers.
SEIU’s tactics are reminiscent of other corporate pressure campaigns
waged by groups from Greenpeace to the Rainforest Action Network to
EarthFirst. Their warfare modus operandi primarily consists of
bullhorns and banners. A successful day at the office is judged by
how much traffic is stopped and how many news cameras filmed the
well-orchestrated circus.
Now comes word that the progressively bold SEIU has authorized its
national leadership to abandon the AFL-CIO and form what they dub an
“aggressively pro-growth coalition.” This divorce could result in a
seismic shift of union power unlike anything seen for decades.
To be certain, SEIU is already considered among the more brazen of
the active unions. But some worry that a contentious split from the
AFL-CIO will embolden the former to ramp up even further their
intimidation tactics against corporate America. Considering their
history, these concerns are certainly warranted.
Chief among their targets has always been Wal-Mart, one of history’s
most successful companies. To the painful chagrin of SEIU,
Wal-Mart’s own workforce has repeatedly voted down unionization.
That’s no matter to this union-on-the-rise; bullies never quit.
Proving that SEIU’s leadership isn’t afraid to eat their own, they
recently attacked the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) by accusing
them of cozying up to Wal-Mart. In a letter sent to each CBC member,
SEIU chastised their efforts to partner with the company such issues
as encouraging the White House to extend the Voting Rights Act of
1965.
Perhaps someone can persuade the union to turn down their rhetoric
just enough to hear the facts. The CBC and Wal-Mart have a very
natural alliance; the retail giant is one of the largest employers
of African Americans and has become a significant supporter of the
CBC Foundation.
True to their mission SEIU has grown into an equal opportunity
attack machine. Not to be forgotten in the shadows of their
anti-Wal-Mart campaign are equally impressive battles against such
recognizable heavyweights as financial stalwart Charles Schwab,
health care companies Advocate and Kaiser Permanente, and global
security firm Wackenhut.
But with SEIU, size doesn’t matter. Their public-relations machine
also runs smear-campaigns against smaller, less recognizable
companies. Most recently the native-Alaskan company Alutiiq Security
and Technology found itself in the crosshairs. Presumably the real
target is once again Wackenhut, but by trying to break legs at
Alutiiq, a Wackenhut contractor, SEIU hopes the latter will cave to
their long-held demands to unionize.
As is the case with their CBC dispute, SEIU appears willing to fire
on their own constituency in pursuit of their big-picture,
idealistic agenda. Shooting at Alutiiq over its status as a federal
contractor only hurts the working-class SEIU has sworn to defend. A
damaged reputation and subsequent loss of clients will mean lost
jobs and lost opportunities for Alaskan students. Like many regional
companies, Alutiiq offer scholarships and contribute sizeable funds
to an array of local initiatives.
Surely SEIU comprehends that Alutiiq has no more control over
Wackenhut’s labor policies than the Wall Street Journal has over the
caterer at the company’s summer barbeque. But if you’re SEIU, the
truth is just a casualty of war.
In America we laud and honor those with a healthy dose of ambition.
But possessing the brand of blind ambition of SEIU could prove
anything but healthy for America’s most innovative and successful
employers.
The brute, clearly, is running scared.
The article I include is by a union-buster. And proud of it, the bastard. A former American senator with the ridiculous name of Malcolm Wallop (one might say that God sometimes gets his retribution in in advance - why is it that so many unpleasant people have ridiculous names, John Spong, Kevin Naff, Malcolm Wallop?). So I recommend that you read the following article as you would a note from your worst enemy, with the due interpretative attitude.
Lost in the summer news shuffle of judicial nominations and social
security reform spins a fascinating story with tremendous long-term
significance. It is the deepening rift between the Service Employees
International Union (SEIU) and the 800-pound American Federation of
Labor - Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO).
Union strife is nothing new; followers of union politics know that
membership is in decline. In fact, I admittedly watched with
satisfaction as their numbers first began slipping during my three
terms as a United States Senator from 1976-1994 representing the
nearly union-free state of Wyoming.
Now moving into the new century many of my free-market, free-trade
colleagues and I relish in the continued decline. There is, however,
one notable exception in the increasingly powerful SEIU. Now the
nation’s largest union, SEIU bucks the trend by engaging in slick,
heavy-handed intimidation campaigns and by targeting less-skilled,
low-wage workers.
SEIU’s tactics are reminiscent of other corporate pressure campaigns
waged by groups from Greenpeace to the Rainforest Action Network to
EarthFirst. Their warfare modus operandi primarily consists of
bullhorns and banners. A successful day at the office is judged by
how much traffic is stopped and how many news cameras filmed the
well-orchestrated circus.
Now comes word that the progressively bold SEIU has authorized its
national leadership to abandon the AFL-CIO and form what they dub an
“aggressively pro-growth coalition.” This divorce could result in a
seismic shift of union power unlike anything seen for decades.
To be certain, SEIU is already considered among the more brazen of
the active unions. But some worry that a contentious split from the
AFL-CIO will embolden the former to ramp up even further their
intimidation tactics against corporate America. Considering their
history, these concerns are certainly warranted.
Chief among their targets has always been Wal-Mart, one of history’s
most successful companies. To the painful chagrin of SEIU,
Wal-Mart’s own workforce has repeatedly voted down unionization.
That’s no matter to this union-on-the-rise; bullies never quit.
Proving that SEIU’s leadership isn’t afraid to eat their own, they
recently attacked the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) by accusing
them of cozying up to Wal-Mart. In a letter sent to each CBC member,
SEIU chastised their efforts to partner with the company such issues
as encouraging the White House to extend the Voting Rights Act of
1965.
Perhaps someone can persuade the union to turn down their rhetoric
just enough to hear the facts. The CBC and Wal-Mart have a very
natural alliance; the retail giant is one of the largest employers
of African Americans and has become a significant supporter of the
CBC Foundation.
True to their mission SEIU has grown into an equal opportunity
attack machine. Not to be forgotten in the shadows of their
anti-Wal-Mart campaign are equally impressive battles against such
recognizable heavyweights as financial stalwart Charles Schwab,
health care companies Advocate and Kaiser Permanente, and global
security firm Wackenhut.
But with SEIU, size doesn’t matter. Their public-relations machine
also runs smear-campaigns against smaller, less recognizable
companies. Most recently the native-Alaskan company Alutiiq Security
and Technology found itself in the crosshairs. Presumably the real
target is once again Wackenhut, but by trying to break legs at
Alutiiq, a Wackenhut contractor, SEIU hopes the latter will cave to
their long-held demands to unionize.
As is the case with their CBC dispute, SEIU appears willing to fire
on their own constituency in pursuit of their big-picture,
idealistic agenda. Shooting at Alutiiq over its status as a federal
contractor only hurts the working-class SEIU has sworn to defend. A
damaged reputation and subsequent loss of clients will mean lost
jobs and lost opportunities for Alaskan students. Like many regional
companies, Alutiiq offer scholarships and contribute sizeable funds
to an array of local initiatives.
Surely SEIU comprehends that Alutiiq has no more control over
Wackenhut’s labor policies than the Wall Street Journal has over the
caterer at the company’s summer barbeque. But if you’re SEIU, the
truth is just a casualty of war.
In America we laud and honor those with a healthy dose of ambition.
But possessing the brand of blind ambition of SEIU could prove
anything but healthy for America’s most innovative and successful
employers.
The brute, clearly, is running scared.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
Re: Hmm
Date: 2005-07-04 02:18 am (UTC)Believe me, we hate this. Constantly, we're having to teach to the test. We didn't want the laptops in the schools at all; our state Department of Education said in a nutshell, "This is the way it's going to be...deal with it."
As far as state of the art, re-read the part of my post where I talk about my old tuba and bass drum. This year, I got enough money for a euphonium for one student. When he got it, he didn't know where to put his hands, because the instrument had EVOLVED in design since the last one we bought. We don't have the monies to get instruments. I have no MIDI capabilities, I don't have an overhead, hell I don't even have a blackboard. I'm below bare bones.
Have you looked into the NEA? Really looked? I understand that you've had experience with the British union, and from what you say it doesn't really sound like the NEA at all. I'm not saying we're perfect, far from actually. But in my profession, where if a kid gets pissed that you didn't give them a good grade, and they can press sexual assault charges on you (and I teach in a tiny room far away from the rest of the school, usually two students at a time so I am in danger of those things...) if you're in the NEA they'll see to it that you get legal representation and pay while you're being investigated. Being in the union means we can work as a large group to get better prices on oil. If not for the Maine chapter of the NEA, I wouldn't get paid for doing all the extras I have to do, such as pep band, night PETs and travel expenses if I have to drive a kid to All-State.
Education right now is the shit. Kids aren't learning anything, because teachers have to teach to about eight assessments every year. We see kids in first grade who don't want to come to school because they're tired of taking tests. We see kids who drop out at 16 because they've failed so many classes they KNOW they'll never meet the expectations, so why bother staying? The NEA is fighting NCLB tooth and nail because not every kid is the same, and that's what they want to do (those in government)