fpb: (Default)
So far, McCain supporters have been greatly disappointed by his performance against Obama. I will, personally, wait and see until the vote, and then decide whether the man who managed to completely defeat the Republican Party establishment practically without any starting means could not find a way around his current opponent. However, there is one thing I know for sure: the strategy that a loud chorus of conservative pundits are calling for - hound the steps of the young Obama for evidence of political extremism and what they call "socialism" - is bound to fail. I do not know what these gentlemen's life experience is, but in that of most of us, a certain amount of more or less reflexive student-union leftishness is practically inevitable. Everyone who has been at college has had Communist friends and maybe an anarchist acquaintance or few, had a favourite professor who was a Socialist theorist, or an aggressive race-theorist acquaintance. You cannot scare a modern public with what Obama did or said twenty years ago; not when the man - apart from his abortion proposals - is offering a program that is really further to the right (as [personal profile] kennahijja has pointed out) than the standard of a perfectly democratic left party in most Western countries. There probably is more to be got out of his connection with the Daley machine and with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac; Americans and electors in general still dislike party machines, corrupt politicians, and connections between politics and big business.

Bewildered

Oct. 5th, 2008 08:09 am
fpb: (Default)
One of the ways in which Americans, or at least Republicans, simply do not seem to live on the same planet as the rest of us, is shown by the fury with which the whole Republican party has attacked Joe Biden for saying that paying tax - sorry: for the rich to pay more tax - could be regarded as patriotic. The poor man has not said one thing - not his celebrated plagiarism of Neil Kinnock, not his bizarre opinions on Iran or Iraq, not his fourteen great and small proven misstatements in the vice-presidential debate alone - on which bloggerdom and campaign alike have fallen with half the ferocity, the repeated outrage, the pretend irony and real fury with which they have handled what should be a statement of the obvious. Of course paying tax is patriotic; just as hiding your profits in Third World holes with no taxation is unpatriotic and anti-national. Of course paying tax is patriotic; it is one of the basic duties of any citizen, one of the bonds that bind citizen and country, citizen and state, and entitle the citizen to make demands of the state and be heard. Of course paying tax is patriotic: it pays for the army that defends you, the police force that protects you, the courts that enforce your rights and the bureaucracy that records them (as well as, in countries that have one, the health service that defends your health). Of course paying tax is patriotic; can you conceive of a patriot - I am not speaking to the Americans, for evidently they can - can you conceive of a patriot who would want his government to be feeble, penniless, incapable of performing its basic duties?

The Republicans have made this one of the core elements of their message. When Sarah Palin directly attacked Obama for his closer relationship with the unrepentant terrorist William Ayers (surely a powerful enough message in itself), she bathetically capped it with a reminder that "these are the people who think that paying more tax is patriotic". As if, you know, asking people to pay more tax were not only on the same level as being acquainted with bomb-throwers, but actually explained and justified it. And if you think that this is only Palin, you have not been following the conservative blogosphere.

In any other country in the world this would be suicide: even in sister English-speaking countries such as Britain or Australia, which share American attitudes to some degree, this continuous hammering at the patriotism of not paying more tax would expose the party to the answer that their only patriotism resides evidently in their wallet, that they stop being patriotic the moment they have to pay a penny extra for it. Such an answer would be popular and probably reach the majority; it would rouse both hilarity and contempt. Yet, in America, the immensely clever and far-sighted McCain campaign, that has not put a foot wrong yet, clearly expects this to be a successful point, and that hilarity and contempt will only flow the other way.

This is one of those moments where I feel helpless before American attitudes. No matter how much I work at it, I simply do not understand them. I do not know whether the McCain campaign has calculated correctly, and whether the majority of Americans will react negatively to Biden's point - which was about the richer part of the community anyway - and positively to Republican mockery; or whether the reaction will be as it is in most other nations, that from time to time it may be necessary to raise tax, and that if it really is necessary, then it is patriotic to pay it (and in any case profoundly unpatriotic to set up fake trust funds in the Cayman Islands or the like). But I would say that the reaction to this will tell us a lot.
fpb: (Default)
Matt Towery is a little-known conservative pundit, certainly not on the level of the Limbaughs or Victor Davis Hanson. But he has more sense than any ten of them, with the possible exception of Paul Weyrich and Paul Greenberg. Matt Towery was the only one who saw the economic crisis coming, and was predicting, from early last year, that it would be the dominant issue in the election - this at a time when no-one, left or right, had any idea that anything was seriously wrong with the economy. And that is no coincidence. Matt Towery starts from the wholesome principle of paying attention to what people are telling him, and he was aware from early last year that people were under intolerable pressure and that jobs and mortgages were going. It pays to pay attention to the public rather than to your own crowd or to the dictates of your ideology. And to remember that freemarketeer ideology is no less an ideology than Communism.

So I have more time for Mr.Towery than for perhaps any other Townhall.com habitue', with the possible exception of Susan Fields and the two I mentioned. And when I find that he agrees with me on what the Repbublican establishment is trying to do to to Senator McCain - and that he does so from the standpoint of much greater knowledge, as someone who knows the Republicans from the inside - I am both heartened and depressed. Heartened because it is nice to have one's views confirmed, as I said about the Massachusetts mass pregnancy. Depressed because I want McCain to win, and it looks like his own supposed party is setting him up to lose out either of misguided group cohesion - better to thwap the outsider and lose, looking forward to the next election when the "right" kind of people will once more be dependably available - or out of sheer arrogance - in spite of what all those silly pollsters and pundits tell us, we know that we are right and we don't need to change a thing, so it will be McCain who has to adapt to our way of doing things. Here is Towery's article in its entirety:
Read more... )

I have no affection for a good deal of the Republican baggage. I find their claim to economic competence laughable, their attitude to Islam ignorant, their principles absent, and their view of society at large opportunistic and hollow. I think they are trying to exploit genuine popular movements and grievances - social conservatives, libertarians, Christians - without either taking them seriously or doing anything about their real issues, in the coldly calculated belief that these despised proles have nowhere else to go and therefore will have to accept whatever the high Republican kitchen chooses to serve them. I want McCain to win for the very reason why they want him either disciplined out of his life or defeated: namely, that yours truly takes some issues - in particular, abortion and euthanasia - seriously. Otherwise, I do not give a damn about the party lines. The public of the United States, against the party line of both parties, has produced two remarkable and personally impressive candidates. The party machines are well on their way to sucking the life out of both.
fpb: (Default)
I have been thinking. I am increasingly convinced that, by choosing John McCain as presidential candidate, the Republican rank and file showed much greater wisdom than their leaders and their opinion makers. They picked the only candidate who stands a chance against the Dem-of-the-day - I do not mean Hillary or Barack; I mean anyone whom the Democrats could have chosen. Let us face it, in the circumstances of 2008, the Democrats really could have run the yellow dog of the old joke, and got it to the White House.Read more... )

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 11:46 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios