fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
I think that the future of the whole world depends on two monstrous gambles, in which most of us are concerned. One is to do with Islam: the effort to tame the rebellious and Titanic spirit of this religion by continued acquaintance and collaboration with a world that now includes not only the West but also the Far East and India. The other is the Chinese leadership's gamble that they can keep the colossal Chinese rate of economic growth going for another generation, absorbing the immense mass of unemployed in new businesses (the unemployed in China are estimated to be anything up to fifty or a hundred million) and stabilize the Chinese state on the income from taxation. If that fails, China might collapse into another of its civil wars, which are historically her reaction to change; but a civil war in a country of 1.4billion and with the atom bomb simply does not bear thinking about.

(That is why I was alarmed by [profile] bufo_viridis' offhand reference to the likelihood of China invading and taking over Taiwan by force. This would be a disastrous step; even supposing for a second that the US and Japan would not become involved in such a war, Taiwan is a virtually independent country that is one of the world's top ten economies. Its investments abroad, and foreign investments in it, are enormous. Its sudden destruction in a surely bloody and expensive war - Taiwan is armed to the teeth, as far as its small size allows it to be - would be a worldwide economic disaster; and China itself would suffer as much as anyone. The after-effects might be just as bad, if China's export markets suddenly start feeling mistrust towards it. Altogether, I can imagine no foreign-policy development more likely to stop the great Chinese growth in its tracks and endanger the great Chinese gamble.)

Date: 2006-01-15 02:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] goreism.livejournal.com
That might have something to do with whether the woman in question is a waishengren (外省人) or benshengren (Literally, "extraprovincial" and uh... "intraprovincial"? But they refer to the largely Mandarin-speaking population that came with Chiang Kai-shek after the Civil War, and the largely Minnan speaking population that's been around since the Ming dynasty). Waishengren, as might be expected, are generally more in favor of KMT and pan-blue and reunification in general, whereas benshengren are usually more open to the DPP, pan-green, and Taiwanese localization (and perhaps independence, though supporters of "Taidu" still remain a minority). As with any other place of similar size, the Taiwanese population isn't monolithic.

Incidentally, whatever The Epoch Times says, I think the possibility of a cross-strait military conflict anytime in the forseeable future is really low. It would be, as you point out, disastrous for almost everybody involved.

Also, you noted that neither side recognizes the other's independence. While this is true de jure, since Lee Teng-hui's time, Taiwan (the ROC, if you like) has informally acknowledged the mainland's independence, and made overtures toward Mongolia (which it still recognizes de jure as part of the ROC). Actually changing the claimed borders of the ROC (which includes both Outer Mongolia and Tibet) is constitutionally problematic.

I tend to distrust polls on the issue; they devolve too much on definitions of exactly what "Taiwanese independence" means. Would representation of Taiwan in the WTO be independence? What about scrapping the old ROC constitution? All of these are controversial moves, which are seen by some as tantamount to a declaration of independence, and some as just... not.

If you're wondering where I come down on the issue (as someone who can conveniently register for dual ROC citizenship as a closer than a sixth-generation descendant of a Chinese person, due to the Republic's rather racist citizenship laws), I, just like—as far as I know from watching the news—most Taiwanese citizens, just favor the status quo. With a few exceptions, Taiwan manages to conduct the necessary day-to-day affairs of a country through Taipei Economic and Cultural Offices or whatever.

(Not that I'm planning on registering for citizenship anytime soon. The only benefit I can see is using my "minguo" birth year on the ID card to make myself look older, and the downside is putting myself at risk for military service if I spend too much time in Taiwan.)

military service

Date: 2006-01-16 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
This reminds me of my own time in the Italian Army. Actually, it is not without value. And there is something about being in the Army that makes you chatty about your experiences there for the rest of your life.

Taiwan

Date: 2006-01-16 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
From my point of view, and from that of most linguists and anthropologists, the ruin of the aboriginal populations and languages of Taiwan is the worst result of the Chinese invasion, especially after 1945. Those tiny and neglected ethnic groups are generally reputed to be the most archaic in the immense Austronesian language group, that spread across the face of the globe from Madagascar to Easter Island; and there seems to be a consensus among many linguists that the ancestors of the Austronesians actually set out from Taiwan, which would make this island one of the most important spots in human history. Apart from anything else, the spread of these languages indicates some early technological breakthrough that made the aboriginal Taiwanese able to master the oceans, which nobody else until the Vikings managed. I understand that the neglect and persecution of aboriginal languages are now being to some extent reversed, but it may be too late, and that would be very sad.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 06:04 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios