I told you all two years ago
Mar. 20th, 2010 05:17 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
As for President Obama:
1) he has broken his own promise on Don't Ask Don't Tell, something to which few reasonable people would have seen an objection. (That at least one right-wing columnist broke Godwin's Law in trying to find an argument against accepting homosexual soldiers just shows how poor the arguments for this really are.)
2) He has broken his promise on torture and even let into his administration a couple of people whose hands are dirty in the matter, such as Robert Gates.
3) He is wrecking his own proposals for health reform rather than give up a sneaky and unprincipled attempt to break the consensus on abortion (no federal monies for), and he is lying about it.
4) He is guilty of deliberately stirring up trouble against Israel, with the miserable Quartet all too happy to follow his lead.
5) He has ignored both the hideous threat of an Iranian atom bomb and, more disgracefully, the desperate struggle of the Iranian people against a bloodthirsty and disastrous tyranny. He has repeatedly spoken as though the mullah's government were the legitimate leadership of that unhappy country.
Oh, and strictly for Catholics:
6) According to Life Site News International, he has deliberately egged on Catholic Health Association, and possibly the Leadership Conference of Religious Women (although that lot don't need much egging) to revolt against the Bishops. I quote: White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs revealed to reporters today that President Barack Obama actively promoted the Catholic Health Association's public break with the American Catholic bishops to support his health care legislation.
Gibbs also suggested that the CHA and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious' (LCWR) break with the U.S. Bishops has provided legitimate political cover for pro-life Democrats to switch their votes from "no" to "yes."
(...)
Gibbs said that the president had been engaged on the issue, and a reporter asked if he had reached out personally to the groups.
"The President met earlier this week with Sr. Keehan of the CHA," said Gibbs, saying the meeting took place in the Roosevelt Room, but that he "did not get a detailed run-down of the pitch that [Obama] made."
"I do know that he was effusive about her support and her as a person for making the courageous statements that she has," he said.
Well, at least he was not shameless enough to tell his own spokesman what he had done with or offered to this rebel nun.
During the Paris negotiations of 1782-3, the reigning Pope offered Franklin and Adams that the USA government could have a veto over the nomination of Catholic bishops (something that many European governments had at the time). In keeping with their principles, the Founders - few of whom had any sympathy for the Catholic Church as such - nonetheless refused this offer and allowed the Church to organize itself in the new nation as it saw fit. Since then, I know of no President who has ever, for any reason whatever, thought to meddle in the Church's internal affairs and organization.
Hope? Change? Change, all right; hope - that he does not get re-elected.
1) he has broken his own promise on Don't Ask Don't Tell, something to which few reasonable people would have seen an objection. (That at least one right-wing columnist broke Godwin's Law in trying to find an argument against accepting homosexual soldiers just shows how poor the arguments for this really are.)
2) He has broken his promise on torture and even let into his administration a couple of people whose hands are dirty in the matter, such as Robert Gates.
3) He is wrecking his own proposals for health reform rather than give up a sneaky and unprincipled attempt to break the consensus on abortion (no federal monies for), and he is lying about it.
4) He is guilty of deliberately stirring up trouble against Israel, with the miserable Quartet all too happy to follow his lead.
5) He has ignored both the hideous threat of an Iranian atom bomb and, more disgracefully, the desperate struggle of the Iranian people against a bloodthirsty and disastrous tyranny. He has repeatedly spoken as though the mullah's government were the legitimate leadership of that unhappy country.
Oh, and strictly for Catholics:
6) According to Life Site News International, he has deliberately egged on Catholic Health Association, and possibly the Leadership Conference of Religious Women (although that lot don't need much egging) to revolt against the Bishops. I quote: White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs revealed to reporters today that President Barack Obama actively promoted the Catholic Health Association's public break with the American Catholic bishops to support his health care legislation.
Gibbs also suggested that the CHA and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious' (LCWR) break with the U.S. Bishops has provided legitimate political cover for pro-life Democrats to switch their votes from "no" to "yes."
(...)
Gibbs said that the president had been engaged on the issue, and a reporter asked if he had reached out personally to the groups.
"The President met earlier this week with Sr. Keehan of the CHA," said Gibbs, saying the meeting took place in the Roosevelt Room, but that he "did not get a detailed run-down of the pitch that [Obama] made."
"I do know that he was effusive about her support and her as a person for making the courageous statements that she has," he said.
Well, at least he was not shameless enough to tell his own spokesman what he had done with or offered to this rebel nun.
During the Paris negotiations of 1782-3, the reigning Pope offered Franklin and Adams that the USA government could have a veto over the nomination of Catholic bishops (something that many European governments had at the time). In keeping with their principles, the Founders - few of whom had any sympathy for the Catholic Church as such - nonetheless refused this offer and allowed the Church to organize itself in the new nation as it saw fit. Since then, I know of no President who has ever, for any reason whatever, thought to meddle in the Church's internal affairs and organization.
Hope? Change? Change, all right; hope - that he does not get re-elected.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:23 am (UTC)What the crap
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:31 am (UTC)Speaking as someone who WANTS universal health care, this is making me crazy.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:Re: My favourite Barry
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 09:39 pm (UTC)(Sorry, I know I wanted to stop for the day, but I just could not resist this particular one!)
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 05:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 02:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 04:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 01:30 pm (UTC)I voted for Obama last time around, and in some ways I'm getting what I asked for. That said, I won't be voting for him again. His handling of so many affairs has demonstrated that he really wasn't the man for the job in the first place and that he and his administration are in no appreciable way different from previous administrations.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 03:47 pm (UTC)So, yes, believe it or not, I felt Obama himself was not as bad as that. So, yes, he has actually been a bit of a disappointment, in the sense that all my worst fears rather than my hopes have come true. (As I told the wonderful
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 04:39 pm (UTC)His incompetence was to be expected, but it's the only saving, er, grace of his benighted administration - if he actually manages to fail passing Obamacare tomorrow with two chambres bleu horizon, it will be a blessing. Of sorts.
no subject
Date: 2010-03-20 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 04:36 pm (UTC)3, i rarely comment on us or anywhere else's domestic stuff - not having a vote there and so on. but surely, given the unbelievable opposition to it, what has been done is a step in the right direction - even if it will take some time to come into effect and no need to get into the obvious racial inequalities there either? it absolutely amazes me that there's 40 million americans who do not have access to healthcare, and yet you have a country that is prepared to take military action on humanitarian grounds (in the balkans)! as regards the abortion issue, well i suppose if it's sufficiently regulated in the private sector, that's probably ok as it avoids the backstreet whisky and knitting needles procedures of old, but what about people who are not in a position to pay for it? just to clarify a woman's choice of what to do with her own body far outweighs moral indignation or ancient scriptural statement, however difficult the idea may be, and besides regulation is in fact a legal acceptance.
5, an iranian atom bomb isn't a hideous threat, the danger lies in the materials falling into the wrong hands but i don't think it's being ignored. as to the rest, tbh it appears that iran, in many people's eyes, is clearly the wrong type of democracy, like hamas. doesn't mean they're particularly pleasant though...
no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 05:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 05:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-24 07:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-03-25 11:11 am (UTC)'Some supporters of the bill had received threats and abusive messages, prompting them to call police and the FBI.
Democratic House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said more than 10 Democratic politicians had reported incidents since Sunday's vote, some of which he described as "very serious".'
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: