fpb: (Default)
The Iranian nuclear plan remains profoundly worrying, and anyone who does not believe that it is intended to build an atom bomb (and, to my surprise, there are adult human beings who don't) has to answer the question I already asked one such person: why does a country that, one, floats on a sea of oil, two, has insufficient refining capacities - so that it has to buy back its own oil refined by foreigners - and, three, is terrifyingly earthquake-prone, want an expensive "civilian" atomic program, instead of the extra oil refining facilities it desperately needs?

However, a couple of recent news items have made me rethink some points that I was, perhaps, taking far too much for granted.

The first is what we have seen of the secret but obvious war waged by Israel against the Iranian nuclear project. In the last year, at least half a dozen top scientists and nuclear personnel have been murdered, inside Iran; and I, at least, haven't heard of the huge Iranian security apparatus catching even one of the culprits. The conclusion is obvious. Israel must have an efficient and extremely well concealed network of agents in Iran, who can be activated even for terribly dangerous activities such as repeated assassination (where the risk of detection is multiplied by each successive attempt) and achieve their goal. Such a network is not the work of one year: Israel - a country of less than seven million people - must have spent decades setting it into place, building it up piece by careful piece, constantly avoiding detection and exposure. Compare and contrast, for instance, with the frequent exposure of Soviet networks during the Cold War. My guess is that Israel must have had agents in Iran even in the time of the Shah, but that it must have started giving its network the shape it has now - a shape that can kill efficiently and confidently - when Khomeini came to power with his exterminating message against "the little Satan". The Israelis took that message seriously, and worked, year in, year out, from 1979 to this day, to achieve the capacity to strike inside the country if they had to. So it was that this network was in place on the day it was needed, when, after long years of verbiage and cheap terrorism, the Iranians really started on a project with the potential to destroy tiny Israel - namely, the atom bomb. And to the best of my knowledge nobody even suspected that it was there until it began to strike.

Now compare with the Iranians in action. In the last few days, to avenge the murdred scientists, Iranian agents have made murderous attacks against five different diplomatic Israeli targets in various countries including India. Not a single one of them achieved its goal, and the only victim was an Iranian agent who blew his own legs off while apparently trying to dodge the Thai police. The contrast with the Israeli action could not be more glaring. Every target the Israeli aimed at, they hit. Every target the Iranians aimed at, they missed. But there is worse. The Israelis struck inside the enemy country, at targets that could really damage the enemy effort; the Iranians struck around the world, over neutral territory, at targets that made no difference to them. Kill one top scientist and you may have done some harm to the enemy's race to build nukes; kill one diplomat, and another takes its place. (You may also have annoyed the neutrals on whose territory you did the killing - but that is not terribly important here, since neither Iran nor Israel, for different reasons, are very popular anyway.) And the fact that all of this had to be done by obvious amateurs and in neutral countries shows that after more than 25 years of incendiary rhetoric and covert aid to terrorists, Iran still does not have in place any useful covert network. They simply never approached the destruction of Israel as Israel approached the warding off of that destruction - as a job to be done, rather than as a display.

The proper frame to understand the deficiencies of Iran is the recent announcement that it was training a body of female ninjas. I immediately, of course, thought of the late Colonel Gheddafi's famous female bodyguard, for which similar claims were made, and which does not seem to have played any significant part in the struggle for Libya - when it came to the point, the Colonel seems to have put his trust in African mercenaries and local loyalists. It was all show, and rather buffoonish show at that. But at least in Gheddafi's case it had one serious purpose: it was the public face of his determined effort to advance women in Libyan society, an effort that put him at odds with most Libyans and that has since gone brutally into reverse. When a similar gesture is done by one of the most woman-hating and woman-murdering governments in the world, the element of buffoonery is simply unredeemed by any clear purpose. It looks like policy made on the hoof after watching cheap Japanese movies.

This, then, is my view now: the Iranian government is a bunch of buffoons. Mass-murdering buffoons, of course, and still immensely dangerous if they ever manage to build their bomb; but buffoons nevertheless - culturally so comically inadequate as to model supposed elite forces on Japanese comics, and in every way evidently incapable of planning ahead and working efficiently even towards what is supposed to be one of their main goals, the destruction of Israel. In some ways, of course, the idea of a bunch of posturing, inadequate buffoons (and still homicidal) in charge of atom bombs is terrifying; but it demands a different approach from that of an efficient, competent tyranny in the same position.
fpb: (Default)
...and what is more, I disagree with her attitude: humourless, naturally unsubtle, and partisan. But when she's right, she's right, and here she is right to the last letter and comma. To see the ugly troop of justifiers in the comments section is enough to make you vomit.
fpb: (Default)
...the clever, far-sighted Jews. The attack on the flotilla was the stupidest thing I have seen in my lifetime. THE STUPIDEST. It beats Arthur Scargill playing bull to Margaret Thatcher's matador by a mile - and I never thought I would live to see anything more stupid than that. It makes every Italian politician, inlcuding Pecoraro Scanio, seem like a positive genius by comparison. It is the abyss; if you made it up, nobody would believe you. The enemy lay a propaganda trap a child could have seen through - and the idiot Israelis fell straight into it. Anyone with half a brain would have left those seaborne morons alone. Sorry, I stand with the Jews, but a government that acts with such total folly when its very existence is at stake may well turn out to be too stupid to survive.
fpb: (Default)
...and the tyrants of Tehran and associated places, that people have thought of it before. This is a poem by GK Chesterton (yes, he who made bad jokes about Jews - believe it or not):

Read more... )High over noises that deafen and cover us,
Rang the Deliverer's voice out over us.

'Stand thou still, thou sun upon Gibeon,
Stand thou, moon, in the valley of Ajalon!
Shout thou, people, a cry like thunder,
For the kings of the earth are broken asunder.
Now we have said as the thunder says it,
Something is stronger than strength and slays it.
Now we have written for all time later,
Five kings are great, yet a law is greater.
Stare, O sun! in thine own great glory,
This is the turn of the whole world's story.Read more... )
fpb: (Default)
As for President Obama:
1) he has broken his own promise on Don't Ask Don't Tell, something to which few reasonable people would have seen an objection. (That at least one right-wing columnist broke Godwin's Law in trying to find an argument against accepting homosexual soldiers just shows how poor the arguments for this really are.)
2) He has broken his promise on torture and even let into his administration a couple of people whose hands are dirty in the matter, such as Robert Gates.
3) He is wrecking his own proposals for health reform rather than give up a sneaky and unprincipled attempt to break the consensus on abortion (no federal monies for), and he is lying about it.
4) He is guilty of deliberately stirring up trouble against Israel, with the miserable Quartet all too happy to follow his lead.
5) He has ignored both the hideous threat of an Iranian atom bomb and, more disgracefully, the desperate struggle of the Iranian people against a bloodthirsty and disastrous tyranny. He has repeatedly spoken as though the mullah's government were the legitimate leadership of that unhappy country.

Oh, and strictly for Catholics:
6) According to Life Site News International, he has deliberately egged on Catholic Health Association, and possibly the Leadership Conference of Religious Women (although that lot don't need much egging) to revolt against the Bishops. I quote: White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs revealed to reporters today that President Barack Obama actively promoted the Catholic Health Association's public break with the American Catholic bishops to support his health care legislation.
Gibbs also suggested that the CHA and the Leadership Conference of Women Religious' (LCWR) break with the U.S. Bishops has provided legitimate political cover for pro-life Democrats to switch their votes from "no" to "yes."
(...)
Gibbs said that the president had been engaged on the issue, and a reporter asked if he had reached out personally to the groups.
"The President met earlier this week with Sr. Keehan of the CHA," said Gibbs, saying the meeting took place in the Roosevelt Room, but that he "did not get a detailed run-down of the pitch that [Obama] made."
"I do know that he was effusive about her support and her as a person for making the courageous statements that she has," he said.

Well, at least he was not shameless enough to tell his own spokesman what he had done with or offered to this rebel nun.
During the Paris negotiations of 1782-3, the reigning Pope offered Franklin and Adams that the USA government could have a veto over the nomination of Catholic bishops (something that many European governments had at the time). In keeping with their principles, the Founders - few of whom had any sympathy for the Catholic Church as such - nonetheless refused this offer and allowed the Church to organize itself in the new nation as it saw fit. Since then, I know of no President who has ever, for any reason whatever, thought to meddle in the Church's internal affairs and organization.

Hope? Change? Change, all right; hope - that he does not get re-elected.
fpb: (Default)
1
Anyone who doubted Ehud Olmert's resolution to go on to the end - this time - or who hoped or feared a ceasefire in a few days, must have been corrected by the Israeli announcement that reservists have been recalled to arms. No country calls reservists to arms unless it envisages a long campaign.

2
Israel has so far had two unexpected allies - General Winter and Russia. While the pro-Hamas media tried to stir up the usual wave of worldwide condemnation, Europe as a whole was more concerned with the coldest winter in years and with Russian economic warfare via denial of gas supplies. This had several consequences. First, the usual headlines about Israeli atrocities have been swept off most front pages by stories about European cities freezing and missing Russian supplies. Second, as a result, the obviously co-ordinated round of worlwide demos against Israel drew rather fewer Europeans/Americans/locals than had been expected, and turned into almost entirely Muslim affairs, with a few particularly obstinate local extremists sticking to it. As a result, they have been of a violence, a viciousness, and an explicit Jew-bashing odiousness, that the West had forgotten, and have done the jihadi cause nothing but harm. Even the BBC had to broadcast news of a gang of thugs savaging the quiet Jewish London quarter of Golders Green (which I know well). Third, it reminded Europe in particular of the unpleasant nature of depending on an enemy for energy supplies, which is indirectly bad news for the oil monopolies.

3
The call for a ceasefire has been thoroughly mishandled. Its proponents obviously hoped that the Lebanon 2006 script would be followed, but they had neglected one crucial point: when the call for a ceasefire went up in 2006, it started from Hezbollah. Nasrallah and his people were more than willing to stop fighting. Even so, the ceasefire nearly failed - what nobody remembers was that, at the time, Sarkozy sabotaged it at the decisive moment by refusing to send French troops under UN flags to Lebanon, until the Italian prime minister Prodi offered Italian troops instead. Prodi is now out of power, and the current PM, Berlusconi, has absolutely no desire to offer any more jihadi rescue packages. The point is however that Hamas have shown no interest whatever in any kind of ceasefire. The effort at replaying 2006 were therefore doomed; Israel was able to say a firm no in its turn, and the USA were able to allow the Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire to go through in the certainty that it would remain a dead letter. Indeed, the shameful collapse of the ceasefire resolution may well be of advantage to the USA, in that it diminishes further the UN's credibility and effectiveness.

4
The London branch of Hamas' outreach and public relations department - otherwise known as the BBC - never reports the numbers of Israeli losses, even though much of Hamas propaganda elsewhere hinges on the supposed "disproportion" between Israeli and Hamas losses. For this, I think, there is an excellent reason. The drip-drip-drip of small but steady losses would be too reminiscent to the British public of their own mission in Afghanistan, which most Britons support and which the BBC does not (yet?) dare openly attack. This is a mission against as vicious and uncivilized an enemy as Britain have faced in seventy years, and the BBC does not want to do anything that underlines that Israel in Gaza and Britain in Helmand are dealing with basically the same opponents, by the same means.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 4th, 2025 02:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios