fpb: (Athena of Pireus)
Journalists are getting lazier and more ignorant, and enormously important stories in unfamiliar countries are ignored altogether until they explode under everyone's feet. So it has been with the civil war in the Central African Republic, that has not appeared on any major Western outlet, to the best of my knowledge, till the so-called "rebels" were at the gates of its capital Bangui.

I follow the missionaries' news service Fides News, so I was aware of this "rebellion" months ago. The point is that it has completely changed character, and that in a very dangerous and disturbing way, and that if you look at the map it is only a part of a regional group of wars that we should particularly dread.

What happens is this. Months ago, the usual chaos of disaffected tribal and political factions started a desultory revolt against the President. As is often the case, a truce was arranged and the complaints of the various factions were given an airing at a peace conference in Gabon, IIRC. Only, while the majority of the incoherent rebel coalition "Seleka" showed signs of wanting to abide by the deal and go home, it became clear that a supposed minority group regarded it as so much hot air and was resuming the fighting. Now who were these people?

I'll tell you who were and are these people, the people whom the citizens of Bangui call "barbares". They are foreigners who speak Arabic. When they enter a place, they loot and burn all the missionary stations, kill the priests, destroy the missionary hospitals and turn out the sick and dying in the streets. The interesting fact is that Central Africa has practically no Muslim native presence. These people all come from outside.

Now consider this. France's most effective ally, both over the long term and in the recent war in Mali, has been the state of Chad, whose army was hardened by years of conflict with Libyan invaders. (I have spoken with a former French Legionnaire who was there in the seventies and eighties.) Tchadian soldiers accounted for the top jihadist in the area, Abu Zaid, and generally performed very creditably.

But Chad is Central Africa's northern neighbour. If Bangui falls, Chad's capital N'Djamena, which is not far from the border, will be outflanked; and of course, borders on a map matter as little to these jihadis as treaties with infidels. And I don't think it's a coincidence that, after weeks of quiescence, the jihadis in Mali have suddenly made themselves heard with an attack on the biggest and juiciest target within their reach, the great northern city Gao. They are keeping French and Chadian attention focused West, while the menace comes creeping closer south.

As if that was not enough, trouble is being brutally stoked in Nigeria, whose north-eastern border looks towards Chad (and contains the country's Muslim heartland). Finally, you have to remember that the fall of Central Africa would isolate the French-speaking states from the two most effective military powers in the English-speaking east, Uganda and Rwanda, just in case that these determined and active governments, who don't particularly love jihadists, should want to become involved.

This is not a complex of random tribal outbursts and mutinies. It is one single large-scale war, directed from some central planning group. They took advantage of the Seleka revolt to sneak their own men into Central Africa, just as they had previously taken advantage of the Tuareg revolt to gain control of northern Mali; and now they are at the gates of Bangui and Central Africa is more threatened than ever Mali was. If you are a journalist or know one, point all this out to them and try and get them to write it up. It is incredibly important that these things should be known and understood.
fpb: (Default)
1
Anyone who doubted Ehud Olmert's resolution to go on to the end - this time - or who hoped or feared a ceasefire in a few days, must have been corrected by the Israeli announcement that reservists have been recalled to arms. No country calls reservists to arms unless it envisages a long campaign.

2
Israel has so far had two unexpected allies - General Winter and Russia. While the pro-Hamas media tried to stir up the usual wave of worldwide condemnation, Europe as a whole was more concerned with the coldest winter in years and with Russian economic warfare via denial of gas supplies. This had several consequences. First, the usual headlines about Israeli atrocities have been swept off most front pages by stories about European cities freezing and missing Russian supplies. Second, as a result, the obviously co-ordinated round of worlwide demos against Israel drew rather fewer Europeans/Americans/locals than had been expected, and turned into almost entirely Muslim affairs, with a few particularly obstinate local extremists sticking to it. As a result, they have been of a violence, a viciousness, and an explicit Jew-bashing odiousness, that the West had forgotten, and have done the jihadi cause nothing but harm. Even the BBC had to broadcast news of a gang of thugs savaging the quiet Jewish London quarter of Golders Green (which I know well). Third, it reminded Europe in particular of the unpleasant nature of depending on an enemy for energy supplies, which is indirectly bad news for the oil monopolies.

3
The call for a ceasefire has been thoroughly mishandled. Its proponents obviously hoped that the Lebanon 2006 script would be followed, but they had neglected one crucial point: when the call for a ceasefire went up in 2006, it started from Hezbollah. Nasrallah and his people were more than willing to stop fighting. Even so, the ceasefire nearly failed - what nobody remembers was that, at the time, Sarkozy sabotaged it at the decisive moment by refusing to send French troops under UN flags to Lebanon, until the Italian prime minister Prodi offered Italian troops instead. Prodi is now out of power, and the current PM, Berlusconi, has absolutely no desire to offer any more jihadi rescue packages. The point is however that Hamas have shown no interest whatever in any kind of ceasefire. The effort at replaying 2006 were therefore doomed; Israel was able to say a firm no in its turn, and the USA were able to allow the Security Council resolution demanding a ceasefire to go through in the certainty that it would remain a dead letter. Indeed, the shameful collapse of the ceasefire resolution may well be of advantage to the USA, in that it diminishes further the UN's credibility and effectiveness.

4
The London branch of Hamas' outreach and public relations department - otherwise known as the BBC - never reports the numbers of Israeli losses, even though much of Hamas propaganda elsewhere hinges on the supposed "disproportion" between Israeli and Hamas losses. For this, I think, there is an excellent reason. The drip-drip-drip of small but steady losses would be too reminiscent to the British public of their own mission in Afghanistan, which most Britons support and which the BBC does not (yet?) dare openly attack. This is a mission against as vicious and uncivilized an enemy as Britain have faced in seventy years, and the BBC does not want to do anything that underlines that Israel in Gaza and Britain in Helmand are dealing with basically the same opponents, by the same means.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 03:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios