fpb: (Default)
One thing I just love to bits about my country is our sense of humour. Long ago, I made a list that said something like: America is a principle. Britain is a personality. France is conflict. Germany is tragedy. Russia is a siege, as seen from inside the besieged camp. But though Italy is a struggle against overwhelming odds, it is one that is marked by Homeric bursts of laughter. The stern-faced titans of our long history - Dante, Michelangelo, Tiziano, Verdi - leave a misleading impression: the fact is that the country lives a lot more on our enormous tradition of humour and satire, from Boccaccio to Guareschi and Trilussa. It is typical of us that Italy should have had the only Nobel Prizewinnder for literature who was a comedian, and for that matter probably the only writer in history who ever made Communist beliefs funny - both are the same man, Dario Fo Italians regularly have to struggle against events, conditions and rivals,, but they cope - and make sense of the mess - by making fun of it, and most of all of themselves.

That is what I was afraid the Berlusconi years had lost. They have been bad years in many ways, but the worst would have been if we had been reduced to the splenetic and red-faced exchanges that had become typical of our public life then.Now I am no longer worried. Among universal applause and well-deserved laughter, the comedian Corrado Guzzanti has come up with an idea that belongs in the great tradition: the adventures of a very, very minor pagan river god - Aniene - as he tries to make sense of modern Italy and help it. What is great about this is not just that the idea is original and wonderfully executed, but that it is intended to tackle the whole of the country's plight - a wonderfully ambitious goal, and one I was afraid we had forgotten how to do do. Long may Aniene stay with us!
fpb: (Default)
In the old days, comedy leads were either cast as bewildered young men (Harold Lloyd, Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin - Chaplin kept his juvenile looks into his fifties) or people with naturally funny faces (WC Fields, both Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy). Leslie Nielsen, who had spent his youth playing lead in minor movies and TV productions, looked like a president and delivered his lines with authoritative aplomb; responding to the Western public's growing suspicion, already strong in the seventies, that we are really governed by clowns.

Dear God...

Feb. 5th, 2010 12:37 pm
fpb: (Default)
...I am sure You remember my various and loud complaints about one Jonah Goldberg, a journalist in the USA.Read more... )
fpb: (Default)
...is one of the funniest people north of the South Pole. Read this insane skit about raisins and religion - with the no less hilarious comments page - and laugh till you choke: http://expectare.livejournal.com/331482.html
fpb: (Default)
...seems to have a natural affinity with great humour writing. And that is not to be wondered at, since if you described it to the classic man from Mars, he would be apt to think you were either having him on or stark staring bonkers. But whatever may be said of the sanity of its inventors and practitioners, one thing is certain: it has given rise to much deliriously funny writing. Wodehouse's golfing short stories are perhaps the greatest literary achievement on any sport (with the possible exception of JH Carr's How the Steeple Sinderby FC won the FA Cup, but a neck ahead of Dick Francis' wonderful horse-racing thrillers), and they are matched by an avalanche of golfing cartoons and vignettes, including the many hilarious comic strips of the late and very much lamented Johnny Hart (B.C.).

It was inevitable that when someone saw fit to deliver a really stinging indictment of the game, he would do so in hilarious prose. And it has happened, of all places, in that most po-faced and unwitty of conservative outlets, American Thinker. But if you want to open your year with a good chuckle - and that is whether you love golf or not - you should go and read it. The more since, in typical fashion, being in receipt of an absolute, light-hearted gem of an article, the politically-obsessive readership of American Thinker have not left so much as one comment so far. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/the_last_great_tiger_hunt.html
EDITED IN: they have now left a few comments. But, as was to be expected, most of them are humourless, often political, and in at least one case misguided in the extreme.
fpb: (Default)
He is an elderly columnist and former Hollywood scriptwriter who seems to me to be the classic instance of a man who has changed his political opinions without learning to think, but only picked up another set of stereotypes.

However, one does not handle the English language for a living for half a century without learning a thing or two about it. Read the following passage (about the Los Angeles Times) and tell me whether it is not the perfect squelch, worthy of Oscar Wilde or Mark Twain:

I wouldn’t want to give you the idea that my hometown newspaper is entirely heartless when it comes to right-wingers. In fact, just recently, I had occasion to write the following letter to the editor: “First it was William F. Buckley who got a terrific, extremely respectful, front page sendoff. Today, it was Charlton Heston’s turn. Clearly, all a conservative has to do in order to get his just deserts from the L.A. Times is to die on a slow news day."
fpb: (Default)
What genius decided that the only American city to be touched by the Olympic torch was going to be San Francisco, home of every professional protester in North America?
fpb: (Default)
Aie aie aie. Woe oh woe.

Having to read very large books.
Having to read very large books in German.
Having to read very large books in German and printed in Gothic script.
fpb: (Default)
I just found out that I have been satirized - in the most elegant, witty and downright hilarious manner imaginable. I cannot commend the author, [personal profile] mina_de_malfois, enough. The only problem is that it will only be fully understood and enjoyed by those who have been reading me for years. Nevertheless, if you want a good old-fashioned belly laugh, have a try: http://mina-de-malfois.livejournal.com/9383.html. As for me, by the third paragraph of a certain character's outpourings, I was laughing out loud with tears running down my face.
fpb: (Default)
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

Rolf Bartels of Germany, European gold in the shot put, shaking the hand of Joachim Olsen of Denmark, bronze, and telling him that he is too skinny and must really put on a little weight if he wants to be world class.
(P.S.: I made up that last bit. At least, I think I did.)
fpb: (Default)
Is Hell Exothermic or Endothermic?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dr. Schambaugh, of the University of Oklahoma School of Chemical Engineering, Final Exam question for May of 1997. Dr. Schambaugh is known for asking questions such as, "why do airplanes fly?" on his final exams. His one and only final exam question in May 1997 for his Momentum, Heat and Mass Transfer II class was: "Is hell exothermic or endothermic? Support your answer with proof."

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law or some variant. One student, however, wrote the following:

"First, We postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass. If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave.

Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for souls entering hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, then you will go to hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and souls go to hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant. Two options exist:

If hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose.
If hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over.
So which is it? If we accept the quote given to me by Theresa Manyan during Freshman year, "that it will be a cold night in hell before I sleep with you" and take into account the fact that I still have NOT succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then Option 2 cannot be true...Thus, hell is exothermic."

The student, Tim Graham, got the only A.

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 14th, 2025 09:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios