fpb: (Default)
[personal profile] fpb
Jennifer Aniston is a serial failure in relationships. No man has stayed with her long enough to start a family. No wonder she feels so happy about the existence of IVF.

But, given her box-office and critical record, I bet she wishes that a movie-hit version of IVF existed, so that one could have artificial movie hits when the dumb public and nasty critics deny you a natural one.

Date: 2010-08-14 11:29 am (UTC)
ext_1059: (Default)
From: [identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com
Now that's plain uncharitable, that is.

Date: 2010-08-17 07:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Anniston was not only promoting her views, she was promoting her new movie, which promotes her views. And the lady has form; she has made poisonous material before (http://fpb.livejournal.com/177227.html). I think she has made herself a fair target.

Date: 2010-08-19 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elegant-bonfire.livejournal.com
In all fairness, hardly anyone in Hollywoodland can maintain a long-term relationship. It's such a warped and overexposed culture, the only people I can think of who did are Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward.

Date: 2010-08-19 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com
Yes, but Anniston's most famous ex has clocked up a lot more time even with the flakey Angelina Jolie than he ever did with her. I think there is something about her that is more than usually addled when it comes to relationships. (And successful Hollywood relationships aren't always noticed. We only realized that Liam Neeson and poor Natasha Richardson had had a fifteen-year marriage and three children when the lady died in that wretched accident.)

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 07:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios