fpb: (Default)
fpb ([personal profile] fpb) wrote2010-08-14 12:16 pm

Hollywood hath spoken - again

Jennifer Aniston is a serial failure in relationships. No man has stayed with her long enough to start a family. No wonder she feels so happy about the existence of IVF.

But, given her box-office and critical record, I bet she wishes that a movie-hit version of IVF existed, so that one could have artificial movie hits when the dumb public and nasty critics deny you a natural one.
ext_1059: (Default)

[identity profile] shezan.livejournal.com 2010-08-14 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
Now that's plain uncharitable, that is.

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2010-08-17 07:31 am (UTC)(link)
Anniston was not only promoting her views, she was promoting her new movie, which promotes her views. And the lady has form; she has made poisonous material before (http://fpb.livejournal.com/177227.html). I think she has made herself a fair target.

[identity profile] elegant-bonfire.livejournal.com 2010-08-19 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
In all fairness, hardly anyone in Hollywoodland can maintain a long-term relationship. It's such a warped and overexposed culture, the only people I can think of who did are Paul Newman and Joanne Woodward.

[identity profile] fpb.livejournal.com 2010-08-19 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, but Anniston's most famous ex has clocked up a lot more time even with the flakey Angelina Jolie than he ever did with her. I think there is something about her that is more than usually addled when it comes to relationships. (And successful Hollywood relationships aren't always noticed. We only realized that Liam Neeson and poor Natasha Richardson had had a fifteen-year marriage and three children when the lady died in that wretched accident.)