fpb: (Athena of Pireus)
This is without a doubt the most horrifying piece of news yet to come out of the Western side of the Cold War.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2013/11/nearly-two-decades-nuclear-launch-code-minuteman-silos-united-states-00000000/
it seems that the American military had effectively worked to remove the supposed control over nuclear weapon from the President, and effectively allow any four officers who wished to to launch a missile. The considerations behind this piece of total insanity were purely military: suppose the C-in-C were disabled or otherwise unable to react, there could be no effective response to any kind of Soviet aggression. Well, DUH!! If the President had been taken out of the equation, then the war leadership would be probably gone, and all that would be left would be stupid, uncoordinated slaughter. Besides, the point with atomic weapon was not to use them, but to avoid using them, and above all to prevent the other side using them. Say what you will about mutual assured destruction, but it kept two power groups that hated each other's guts from replying the horrible, destructive folly of the two world wars.

But never mind the "Dr.Strangelove" option with four junior officers just deciding to go off and fire a Minuteman rocket on their own. Do you have the least idea what would have happened if this piece of idiocy by US armed forces had ever got out? NATO would have been finished, that's what. Are any of you old enough to remember the huge pacifist demonstrations of 1980-1982? I was there, and I can tell you what they were about. They were not Communist-led or pro-Russian; almost everyone who took part despised Soviet Russia as a backward, vicious tyranny. They were about the feeling that the USA were playing dice with the lives and future of Europeans. If WWIII ever came, it would have been fought in Europe. Every one of us was aware of that; many had been through military service - most European armies at the time were still conscript - and we were all aware that we were constantly staring down a lot of Russian barrels. We hated the idea that the American forces could essentially use our countries as a nuclear chessboard. That being the case, I can tell you with absolute certainty that if the European public had known that the armed aliens in their midst could launch nuclear strikes virtually at will, and that they had deliberately cut out both the US civilian leadership AND the European governments, there would have been a political earthquake. No country from Norway to Turkey and from West Germany to Portugal would have allowed a single American soldier to remain on its territory. It would have been the end of the alliance. And for that alone one has to say that the generals who had this bright idea were stupid beyond criminality.

Yet more evidence that "war is too important a matter to leave to generals" (Georges Clemenceau said that, and he knew a thing or two about it). It is an ugly thought that, today, an army that was capable of such folly remains the most respected - or at least least despised - institution in America. A few generations of corrupt and incompetent politicians have salted the fields of democratic institutions, making half the population hate one half of government and the other half the other. Let us just hope that we don't pay for this collective loss of faith.
fpb: (Default)
A few opening observations.
Point one: I am no fan of the current European leadership.
Point two: I regard The American Thinker as one of the better online conservative magazines.
However, hobby-horses and prejudices are nasty beasts - they sometimes blind people even to what they themselves write.

The following copies every word of an entry by Thomas Lifson:

I am shocked, shocked to see realpolitik here

The EU’s political leaders behaved just as their diplomatic posture requires. Be “nice” and polite to Russia’s Putin, and, of course he would reciprocate. Unfortunately for them, Putin is not a man for whom the opinions of polite society count more than his own self-interest. So they are “shocked” that he has rebuffed their earnest pleas on behalf og human rights. The BBC reports:

Insiders’ reports from EU leaders’ dinner with Russian President Vladimir Putin last Friday suggest Europe’s diplomats have begun the week suffering from diplomatic indigestion.

All 25 European Union leaders met Mr Putin in Finland.

Accounts of the meeting from some of those present there speak of unusually blunt exchanges between the two sides, in which Mr Putin said he would not listen to lectures about human rights, and rejected EU demands over its vitally important oil and gas business.

Like some blazing row between world celebrities in a private club, word of the verbal fisticuffs is coming out in dribs and drabs and is still spreading.

I do not expect them to draw the appropriate conclusions about the ineffectivenes, no make that counter-productiveness, of pretending that sweet talk is any kind of substitute for power. At least this time the fate of the world does not hang in the balance. Al Qaeda and militant Islam are another story.

Hat tip: Joe Crowley

Thomas Lifson 10 125 06


So: all the stories describe Europeans shouting furiously at Putin and a totally unfriendly atmosphere. But Thomas Lifson "knows" that Europeans are effeminate cowards who always pussyfoot around issues. So, in spite of the words he himself reports, he describes this as the umpteenth instance of European effeminacy. If Europeans take Americans, especially of the Republican kind, as mindless and ignorant macho morons, tell me, Mr.Lifson, have you never done anything to justify that prejudice?

Profile

fpb: (Default)
fpb

February 2019

S M T W T F S
     12
345 6789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 02:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios