Reflections of a stormy petrel

This is without a doubt the most horrifying piece of news yet to come out of the Western side of the Cold War.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2013/11/nearly-two-decades-nuclear-launch-code-minuteman-silos-united-states-00000000/
it seems that the American military had effectively worked to remove the supposed control over nuclear weapon from the President, and effectively allow any four officers who wished to to launch a missile. The considerations behind this piece of total insanity were purely military: suppose the C-in-C were disabled or otherwise unable to react, there could be no effective response to any kind of Soviet aggression. Well, DUH!! If the President had been taken out of the equation, then the war leadership would be probably gone, and all that would be left would be stupid, uncoordinated slaughter. Besides, the point with atomic weapon was not to use them, but to avoid using them, and above all to prevent the other side using them. Say what you will about mutual assured destruction, but it kept two power groups that hated each other's guts from replying the horrible, destructive folly of the two world wars.

But never mind the "Dr.Strangelove" option with four junior officers just deciding to go off and fire a Minuteman rocket on their own. Do you have the least idea what would have happened if this piece of idiocy by US armed forces had ever got out? NATO would have been finished, that's what. Are any of you old enough to remember the huge pacifist demonstrations of 1980-1982? I was there, and I can tell you what they were about. They were not Communist-led or pro-Russian; almost everyone who took part despised Soviet Russia as a backward, vicious tyranny. They were about the feeling that the USA were playing dice with the lives and future of Europeans. If WWIII ever came, it would have been fought in Europe. Every one of us was aware of that; many had been through military service - most European armies at the time were still conscript - and we were all aware that we were constantly staring down a lot of Russian barrels. We hated the idea that the American forces could essentially use our countries as a nuclear chessboard. That being the case, I can tell you with absolute certainty that if the European public had known that the armed aliens in their midst could launch nuclear strikes virtually at will, and that they had deliberately cut out both the US civilian leadership AND the European governments, there would have been a political earthquake. No country from Norway to Turkey and from West Germany to Portugal would have allowed a single American soldier to remain on its territory. It would have been the end of the alliance. And for that alone one has to say that the generals who had this bright idea were stupid beyond criminality.

Yet more evidence that "war is too important a matter to leave to generals" (Georges Clemenceau said that, and he knew a thing or two about it). It is an ugly thought that, today, an army that was capable of such folly remains the most respected - or at least least despised - institution in America. A few generations of corrupt and incompetent politicians have salted the fields of democratic institutions, making half the population hate one half of government and the other half the other. Let us just hope that we don't pay for this collective loss of faith.

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/09/18/my-money-i-deserve-to-keep-it-all/
Yes, look at those words. Someone really imagines that he has made the world, given himself birth, created the regulated and protected environment in which he operates, granted his father and mother the great privilege of giving him birth and spending immense amounts of their time and effort bringing him up, policed the streets so that he could go to work safely, set up the opportunity to work profitably, produced everything involved in the transactions, and, above all, created a regulated and lawful environment in which work could be carried out and its results peacefully claimed without dispute or seizure. Someone, in short, imagines that anything in the world is really "his".

A further depth of delirium lies in the probability that this same maniac also imagines himself to be Christian.

It is not I, it's not even Socrates or any other sage, who answers him - and ought to silence him, if he were sane: it's Scripture. And here I will use text-proofing, since there is no doubt that this passage is at the heart of Christian thought. First letter to the Corinthians, chapter 4, verse 7: For who makes you differ from another? And what do you have that you did not receive? Now if you did indeed receive it, why do you boast as if you had not received it? What is Christianity about, if not gratitude: gratitude to God for creating us, but also gratitude to each and every one of the hundreds of people and things to whom we owe debts we shall never repay? Did you make yourself? No. Did you ask to be born? No. In that case, accept that you are a part of a community, of a descent and of a state of public order, to which you owe so much that if it did not exist you would not exist either.

(I will add that if you are insane enough to think that you owe nothing to anyone but yourself, you make yourself incapable of friendship, of companionship, of all the things that humans need as much as they need air and water. But that would be to try to reason, and you cannot reason with a madman.)

This moron argues that the individual comes before the State. That is not only false - no individual predates the society they live in - but stupid: it is a chicken-and-the-egg question. The State and the individual come together, as part of a whole. Every man is born into a community, for otherwise he would not be born at all. Every community has a law and an authority to enforce it, and to which individuals resort in distress or perplexity; nobody, but nobody, does everything by himself. I am willing to bet that our lunatic, if anyone ever did anything that he interpreted as a violation of his rights, would not hesitate a second to race for the nearest lawyer and the nearest court. And yet he claims to owe nothing to the State.

But that would be reasoning, and there is no reasoning with madmen. And thanks to the crazed talk of the Tea Party, who can't imagine why others would see them as near-terrorists, a good deal of the American right is in a state of clinical insanity. I just hadn't seen it stated quite so baldly before.